Saturday 31 October 2015

What do the American, French, and Haitian Revolutions have in common? Differences?

There were similarities and differences between the French, American, and Haitian Revolutions. One similarity is that in each revolution, people were fighting for freedom from some kind of oppressive rule, at least in the minds of those who were fighting for their freedom. In the United States, the Americans were fighting for freedom from the rule of Great Britain, which many people viewed as oppressive. In France, people revolted against the abuses of the French king and the very high taxes that the people had to pay. In Haiti, slaves were revolting in order to win their freedom and, eventually, to keep their freedom. In both the United States and Haiti, the people were fighting for their freedom from an imperial power.

One significant difference is that the revolution in Haiti, which began as a fight to end slavery, was mainly a revolution led by slaves. 90% of the people in Haiti were enslaved. In just a few years, Haiti went from a country with a very high percentage of slaves to a country with no slaves at all. The Haitians fought valiantly for their independence from France. It was pretty clear that if the Haitians lost, slavery would return to Haiti. Napoleon was beginning to undo some of the actions that had ended slavery in Haiti.


There were similarities and differences between the French, American, and Haitian Revolutions.

What are the section summaries for the book Harvest Of Empire by Juan Gonzalez?

The wording of your question is a bit hard to surmise, but my guess is that you are wanting a summary of the three different sections of the book Harvest of Empire: A History of Latinos in America including the different chapters. In regards to this, the three sections are as follows:  Part 1 (Roots), Part 2 (Branches), and Part 3 (Harvest).

Part 1 is aptly named "Roots" because it is about how all of this began.  The first chapter called "Conquerors and Victims" is about how Hispanics originally formed the American image from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries.  It begins with this quote by Castillo:



The arrival of European explorer to American began the most astounding and far-reaching encounter between cultures in the history of civilization.



European explorers, then can be credited with the creation of the Hispanic community in America. The Aztecs, sickness, and the Church are all discussed.  The next chapter is about the "Spanish Borderlands" and the empire made as a result.  Part one ends with a discussion about “Banana Republics and Bonds” and has to do with Hispanic culture up until 1950. 


Part 2 is named "Branches" because it talks about the literal branches that resulted in the offshoots of the Hispanic culture of the Americas.  The chapters are named from each branch:  Puerto Ricans, Mexicans, Cubans, Dominicans, Central Americans, and Columbians.  Each different cultural branch is discussed in turn, with one branch acting more like refugees while another acts more like citizens.  All of the the branches, however, are vowing to combat division and racism.


Part 3 is called "Harvest" and speaks of the time up until the present day.  The issues involved are many and varied.  The chapters reveal this fact.  The chapters range from Latinos in politics, to old and new immigrants, to the speaking of the Spanish language in America, to free trade agreements, and to Puerto Rico being a special case in regards to its title and citizenship.


In conclusion, the author ties it all nicely together by naming the sections in order of the growing of a vast tree:  "Roots," "Branches," and "Harvest."  It brings the image of a "family tree" to mind, and asks readers to connect all Hispanic Americans in that way.  It is a good history of Hispanic culture in America.

What does this quote illustrate? "These violent delights have violent ends / And in their triumph die, like fire and powder / Which as they kiss...

These words are uttered by Friar Lawrence just before he performs Romeo and Juliet's marriage ceremony.  References to honey and gunpowder may seem strange for a pre-wedding speech, but the crux of what Friar Lawrence is saying is that Romeo and Juliet need to slow things down a bit.  Like gunpowder and a spark coming together, things that are brought hastily together can sometimes explode.  Friar Lawrence also delivers these lines to help Romeo and...

These words are uttered by Friar Lawrence just before he performs Romeo and Juliet's marriage ceremony.  References to honey and gunpowder may seem strange for a pre-wedding speech, but the crux of what Friar Lawrence is saying is that Romeo and Juliet need to slow things down a bit.  Like gunpowder and a spark coming together, things that are brought hastily together can sometimes explode.  Friar Lawrence also delivers these lines to help Romeo and Juliet to understand that, in truth, what they are feeling at this point is more lust than love.  If they are to build a long-lasting marriage, they will need to love more "moderately" and pace themselves.  As he says, "Long love doth so."


What this illustrates is that, while the friar has consented to marry the two, he feels the need to warn them that their passion will dissipate as the marriage progresses and that they will need to build their marriage's foundation on more stable footing.  That is the key to a lasting marriage.  Sadly for Romeo and Juliet, they will never have a chance to put Friar Lawrence's advice into action.

what is the significance of mRNA?

mRNA, or messenger RNA, is the bridge between DNA and proteins, where DNA "stores" the hereditary information, and proteins are often the products made from DNA for a variety of purposes including cell function and structure. In the nuclei of eukaryotic cells, DNA is transcribed into mRNA, essentially a copy of the original DNA information. (The transcribed mRNA isn't actually an exact copy, but the reverse complement of the original DNA, kind of like a...

mRNA, or messenger RNA, is the bridge between DNA and proteins, where DNA "stores" the hereditary information, and proteins are often the products made from DNA for a variety of purposes including cell function and structure. In the nuclei of eukaryotic cells, DNA is transcribed into mRNA, essentially a copy of the original DNA information. (The transcribed mRNA isn't actually an exact copy, but the reverse complement of the original DNA, kind of like a mirror image.) The mRNA then leaves the nucleus and is translated into protein through ribosomes and tRNA, which are specific carriers for protein building blocks that match up to the mRNA sequence.


There are several advantages to having mRNA as the "bridge" between DNA and protein. First, this allows DNA to be kept in the nucleus, away from degrading enzymes. Second, the existence of mRNA allows for additional regulation of gene expression. For example, multiple copies of mRNA can be made from a single DNA template, allowing for high expressions of certain genes. Also, gene expression can be stopped by degrading the mRNA since more mRNA can be made when gene expression needs to be turned on again. 

What is Old Major's claim in Animal Farm and what are three reasons why that is his claim?




The basic claim of Old Major is that all animals, no matter what they believe, are slaves. He makes this point right from the beginning. Here are his words:



No animal in England is free. The life of an animal is misery and slavery: that is the plain truth.






Old Major has a cogent case.  He offers proof. First, he says that man is an enemy.  He says that man is the only animal that produces nothing but consumes everything. Moreover, man is the one who oppresses the animals. Here are his words again:



Man is the only real enemy we have. Remove Man from the scene, and the root cause of hunger and overwork is abolished for ever.




Second, he goes on to say that even the offspring of the animals are not even their own, as man sells or consumes them. He says to Colver that each of his foals were sold off.



Each was sold at a year old — you will never see one of them again.








Finally, Old Major makes the point that even if the animals escaped all of these evils, in the end they are all put under the knife.  They are killed.  Again he says:



But no animal escapes the cruel knife in the end.



Based on these words, Old Major makes a strong case against man. 







Describe an example of a historical situation where the work of many people over time helped solve a human health problem.

It is rare today that a lone scientist working alone in a laboratory will make a break-through discovery which will revolutionize health care.  More likely, multiple scientist working in multiple laboratories following multiple avenues will come together to formulate a cure.  A great example is the polio vaccine.  Today we have two vaccines, the killed (inactivated) Salk vaccine, and live attenuated Sabin vaccine (oral polio vaccine).  The Salk vaccine, successfully tested in 1955, could not...

It is rare today that a lone scientist working alone in a laboratory will make a break-through discovery which will revolutionize health care.  More likely, multiple scientist working in multiple laboratories following multiple avenues will come together to formulate a cure.  A great example is the polio vaccine.  Today we have two vaccines, the killed (inactivated) Salk vaccine, and live attenuated Sabin vaccine (oral polio vaccine).  The Salk vaccine, successfully tested in 1955, could not have been developed without prior experimental results, including, but not limited to: 1) the Enders, Weller, and Robbins demonstration that poliovirus need not be grown in animals but could be grown in culture; 2) the Brodian and Morgan discovery that there are 3 different serotypes of the virus and immunity to one does not confer immunity to the other -- this means the vaccine must be composed of 3 virus serotypes.  Likewise the Sabin vaccine would not be developed without multiple prior experimental results.  Notable is the work by Theiler and Koprowski, who showed the virus could be attenuated by passage in non-human tissue culture cells or at sub-physiological temperatures.  By 1979, widespread transmission of poliovirus was eliminated from the US (the US was declared poliovirus free).  However, sporadic, isolated cases of disease still occur in unvaccinated individuals.


In 1988, the World Health Assemble resolved to eradicate polio virus.  Again multiple researchers, corporations, foundations, and countries came together to initiated this endeavor.  Since that time, the Sabin vaccine has been administered to millions of children, resulting in active transmission in only Afghanistan and Pakistan.


Today researchers are still working on improving the polio vaccine, using techniques of molecular biology, better understanding of virus replication, and more thorough knowledge of immunity.

`y = 1 + sec(x), y = 3` Find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the specified line....

`y=1+sec(x),y=3`


Refer the image. From the graph, the curves intersects at x=-pi/3 and x=pi/3.


Using washer method,


A cross section is a washer of cross sectional area A(x) with,


Inner radius=(1+sec(x))-1=sec(x)


Outer radius=3-1=2


`A(x)=pi(2^2-(sec(x))^2)`


`A(x)=pi(4-sec^2(x))`


Volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about y=1 (V) is,


`V=int_(-pi/3)^(pi/3)A(x)dx`


`V=int_(-pi/3)^(pi/3)pi(4-sec^2(x))dx`


`V=2piint_0^(pi/3)(4-sec^2(x))dx`


`V=2pi[4x-tan(x)]_0^(pi/3)`


`V=2pi((4*pi/3-tan(pi/3))-(4*0-tan(0)))`


`V=2pi(4*pi/3-sqrt(3)-0)`


`V=2pi((4pi)/3-sqrt(3))`


`y=1+sec(x),y=3`


Refer the image. From the graph, the curves intersects at x=-pi/3 and x=pi/3.


Using washer method,


A cross section is a washer of cross sectional area A(x) with,


Inner radius=(1+sec(x))-1=sec(x)


Outer radius=3-1=2


`A(x)=pi(2^2-(sec(x))^2)`


`A(x)=pi(4-sec^2(x))`


Volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about y=1 (V) is,


`V=int_(-pi/3)^(pi/3)A(x)dx`


`V=int_(-pi/3)^(pi/3)pi(4-sec^2(x))dx`


`V=2piint_0^(pi/3)(4-sec^2(x))dx`


`V=2pi[4x-tan(x)]_0^(pi/3)`


`V=2pi((4*pi/3-tan(pi/3))-(4*0-tan(0)))`


`V=2pi(4*pi/3-sqrt(3)-0)`


`V=2pi((4pi)/3-sqrt(3))`


Friday 30 October 2015

Why was it difficult for places like India or Latin America to be united unto themselves?

It was, and is, hard for places like India and Latin America to be truly united because there are too many differences between the people in various parts of these places.  These differences can be ethnic and/or economic.


Both India and Latin America are made up of regions with people of different ethnicities.  It is true that most of Latin America (with Brazil being the main exception) is Spanish-speaking.  However, the different countries of Latin...

It was, and is, hard for places like India and Latin America to be truly united because there are too many differences between the people in various parts of these places.  These differences can be ethnic and/or economic.


Both India and Latin America are made up of regions with people of different ethnicities.  It is true that most of Latin America (with Brazil being the main exception) is Spanish-speaking.  However, the different countries of Latin America do have major ethnic differences between them and in some cases within them.  The indigenous people of Bolivia, for example, do not speak the same language as the indigenous people of Mexico (who do not all speak the same language either).  As another example, Argentina has many more people of European descent than many other Latin American countries.


While India is now one country, it is a huge country that was not really united until independence.  According to the link below, India today has 13 languages that have at least 10 million native speakers. The country also has significant religious minorities that do not always get along with the majority religion.


There are also economic differences between countries and regions.  For example, the CIA Factbook also tells us that the per capita GDPs of Chile and Argentina are both between four and five times higher than that of Honduras even though all three countries are part of Latin America.  There are also huge differences in wealth today between various Indian states.


For these reasons (along with reasons like the size of these regions and the historical difficulty of travelling within them), places like India and Latin America have had a very difficult time trying to unite.

The population of which organisms would most likely increase if there were fewer grasshoppers?

In a given food web, changes in the population of one species affects the population of others, especially the one that serves as the food or the competitor. In the case of grasshoppers, the main food source is grass, vegetables and cereals (basically any plant). If the population of grasshoppers decrease, the population of their main food source, grass and other plants, will increase.


Grasshoppers compete with other herbivores, such as Mormon crickets, etc. It...

In a given food web, changes in the population of one species affects the population of others, especially the one that serves as the food or the competitor. In the case of grasshoppers, the main food source is grass, vegetables and cereals (basically any plant). If the population of grasshoppers decrease, the population of their main food source, grass and other plants, will increase.


Grasshoppers compete with other herbivores, such as Mormon crickets, etc. It has also been reported in studies that grasshoppers compete with larger grazing animals such as bison, for food. Hence, a decrease in population of grasshoppers will mean more food for its competitors. grazing (mammalian) animals and grazing insects. This will result in a higher population of these animals and insects. 


Grasshopper population is controlled by chemical means with insecticides such as malathion and carbaryl, which are commonly used to control the infestation.


Hope this helps.  

In A Christmas Carol, why does Scrooge have any doubts that he will change the future he saw?

He is most uncertain because of the reaction, or perhaps the lack of reaction, he gets from the Ghost of Christmas Future. 


The spirit has shown Scrooge many disturbing things, and Scrooge is petrified that that all of this will come true. Remember, though, that Marley told him at the very beginning of the story that he was going to be visited by three spirits so that he might change his ways. So, Scrooge is...

He is most uncertain because of the reaction, or perhaps the lack of reaction, he gets from the Ghost of Christmas Future. 


The spirit has shown Scrooge many disturbing things, and Scrooge is petrified that that all of this will come true. Remember, though, that Marley told him at the very beginning of the story that he was going to be visited by three spirits so that he might change his ways. So, Scrooge is hoping that Marley is correct and that if he changes he might save himself and others from the terrible fate he has been shown. 



"Men’s courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead,” said Scrooge. “But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me" (Stave Four)!



To this, the spirit says nothing and then simply points to Scrooge's gravestone.This leads Scrooge to worry even further because the spirit is not confirming that if Scrooge changes his behavior that it will change the future. His silence causes Scrooge the most doubt.

Thursday 29 October 2015

How is the human propensity to seek pain exemplified in Edgar Allan Poe’s poem "The Raven"?

This poem is a fascinating example of first-person narration, as well as  powerful exploration of the human capacity for self-induced suffering. The narrator is grieving a lost love, Lenore, and believes the raven who has come to visit may hold answers to his questions about death and the afterlife. We know that the narrator is somewhat indulgent in his grief, as he tries to use books to distract himself ("vainly I had sought to borrow...

This poem is a fascinating example of first-person narration, as well as  powerful exploration of the human capacity for self-induced suffering. The narrator is grieving a lost love, Lenore, and believes the raven who has come to visit may hold answers to his questions about death and the afterlife. We know that the narrator is somewhat indulgent in his grief, as he tries to use books to distract himself ("vainly I had sought to borrow from my books surcease of sorry") but his first reaction when confronted with the tapping noise outside, after realizing it is not a human visitor, is to whisper "Lenore" as if perhaps her ghost may be there. He is haunted by her memory.


He wishes to be reunited with Lenore, who he assumes is in heaven (as suggested by the line "for the rare and radiant maiden whom the angles name Lenore"). Since the raven never gives any answer but "nevermore," the protagonist does have it in his power to craft his questions so that this answer is a positive, rather than a negative, option. But his questions invariably lead to the answer "nevermore" being a response full of finality, sadness and loss of hope.


He asks the raven, as some kind of psychopomp or spiritual messenger, to help him forget Lenore, but is told this will never happen. He asks if he will be reunited with her, and is given the same answer. He then requests that the bird leave him alone, and the response "nevermore" indicates the bird still sits there above his door, a content reminder of his own mortality, and the lonely death that awaits.

What is the story "If I Forget Thee, O Earth..." about?

The story "If I forget thee, O earth…" is about the grimmest and scariest consequence imaginable in the aftermath of a possible nuclear war on the earth. Published in 1951, the story reflects the fear and anxieties prevalent at the time. After the Second World War, the world had rapidly been polarizing into two groups ~ the U.S. and its allies and the U.S.S.R. and its allies.


The massive destruction wrought by the twin nuclear...

The story "If I forget thee, O earth…" is about the grimmest and scariest consequence imaginable in the aftermath of a possible nuclear war on the earth. Published in 1951, the story reflects the fear and anxieties prevalent at the time. After the Second World War, the world had rapidly been polarizing into two groups ~ the U.S. and its allies and the U.S.S.R. and its allies.


The massive destruction wrought by the twin nuclear bombing in the cities of Japan was still fresh in people's memory. During the Cold War, the U.S., the U.S.S.R. and their allies began to produce nuclear warhead at an unprecedented scale, demonstrating their might and superiority.


The third world war seemed imminent. If it happens it would be a nuclear war. What would be its consequences caught the popular imagination of artists, thinkers and philosophers across the world.


This story is an author’s response to this popular imagination regarding the possibility of a massive nuclear war.


The author Arthur C. Clarke imagines the earth to be an uninhabitable planet. The nuclear war has devastated all forms of life on the planet. The earth is still burning with the poisonous radiation. He paints a ghastly image of the earth when seen from the moon:  



"…the portion of the disk (the earth) that should have been in darkness was gleaming faintly with an evil phosphorescence: and he remembered. He was looking upon the funeral pyre of a world—upon the radioactive aftermath…"



The few survivors have built-up a temporary living facility on the lunar surface. They will have to wait there for centuries before they can reclaim the earth. It would happen only when,


The winds and the rains would scour the poisons from the burning lands and carry them to the sea, and in the depths of the sea they would waste their venom until they could harm no living things.”


Thus the story can be read as a warning to the nations involved in the nuclear arms race. It’s an artist’s urge to the strong and the powerful to create a friendly atmosphere giving away their hostilities.

Seniority is at least partly a factor in nearly 90 percent of private sector contracts and can also be found in a variety of public sector...

Seniority can be loosely as the length of time for which a given employee has worked for their employer or in their current position.  Seniority can be measured in different ways.  It can, for example, reset whenever an employee switches positions in a company or it can simply measure how long an employee has worked for the firm in any capacity at all.  Seniority can be used in workplace decisions in a variety of ways.


...

Seniority can be loosely as the length of time for which a given employee has worked for their employer or in their current position.  Seniority can be measured in different ways.  It can, for example, reset whenever an employee switches positions in a company or it can simply measure how long an employee has worked for the firm in any capacity at all.  Seniority can be used in workplace decisions in a variety of ways.


Perhaps the most common way to use seniority is to distribute pay and benefits on the basis of seniority.  Many organizations, particularly in the public sector, have employees’ wages increase automatically as they gain seniority.  As workers’ levels of seniority rise, many employers give them more vacation and/or sick leave hours each year.


In some organizations, seniority can be used to affect larger decisions about employment.  In some organizations, particularly those with union contracts, workers with seniority can be given preference in transferring from one job to another within the organization.  In some organizations, people will be laid off in order of seniority and rehired in the same way when the economy improves.


All of these are ways in which seniority can play a part in workplace decisions.

What is an example of parallelism from Mark Antony's speech?

Parallelism is a common rhetorical device used for emphasis.  As part of a parallel structure, the orator repeats key phrases.  In his "I Have a Dream" speech, for example, Martin Luther King, Jr. starts numerous sentences with "I Have a Dream."  This helps to drive home the central point of the speech.

In Mark Antony's speech, he repeats the line, "And Brutus is an honorable man."  While that sounds innocent enough, the repetition of "Brutus" and "honorable" gets the audience to question whether Brutus is, indeed, honorable, in light of the fact that Brutus just killed his best friend (and the emperor), Julius Caesar.  In between stating, "And Brutus is an honorable man," Mark Antony is actually going about making a case AGAINST Brutus.  Thus, each time that line is repeated, the audience is revisiting the idea of Brutus' honor.  Each time, they are increasingly coming to the conclusion that Brutus is not honorable at all in how he handled Caesar's assassination.

In A Christmas Carol, what does "offal" mean?

Your question refers to a description of the setting in chapter four when the Ghost of Christmas Future takes Ebeneezer Scrooge to view a future scene in a sort of pawnshop, where Scrooge's former employees are selling property that they have looted from future-Scrooge after he died. The shop is in a seedy part of town and is "a low-browed, beetling shop, below a pent-house roof, where iron, old rags, bottles, bones, and greasy offal,...

Your question refers to a description of the setting in chapter four when the Ghost of Christmas Future takes Ebeneezer Scrooge to view a future scene in a sort of pawnshop, where Scrooge's former employees are selling property that they have looted from future-Scrooge after he died. The shop is in a seedy part of town and is "a low-browed, beetling shop, below a pent-house roof, where iron, old rags, bottles, bones, and greasy offal, were brought".


In this context, offal actually refers to leftover body parts of some kind of animal. The description continues with a remark about the "mountains of unseemly rags, masses of corrupted fat, and sepulchres of bones" that are present in the shop. The rotting fat and piles of bones are clearly what Dickens was referring to when he used the word "offal".


In Victorian times men known as rag-and-bone men or rag-gatherers would scavenge all over London looking for anything that they could resell. Salable items included bones and even grease from animal carcasses, since both of these could be put to use by people. The grease could be used in making soap, and the bones could be used for a variety of purposes. It makes sense, then, that offal would be present in the shop where the charwoman and the laundress have come to hawk Scrooge's belongings. Offal was just another commodity in which the shop's proprietor, old Joe, would have trafficked.

Wednesday 28 October 2015

How do you know that Jimmy has truly changed?

O. Henry provides many proofs that Jimmy Valentine has changed. The entire story is about how Jimmy changes from a criminal into a solid citizen. The first direct proof of his change is stated in plain words by the author.


A young lady crossed the street, passed him at the corner and entered a door over which was the sign “The Elmore Bank.” Jimmy Valentine looked into her eyes, forgot what he was, and became another man



Is this possible? Well, it happened pretty fast, but many young men change when they fall in love. They grow up. They realize that there is a serious purpose in life, and for most men this involves getting married, having a family, becoming a provider, having a legitimate and secure profession or a trade, assuming a respectable place in society. All of this happens to Jimmy, as O. Henry illustrates, because of his love for the beautiful and high-principled Annabel Adams.


Early in the story O. Henry describes Jimmy's suitcase in detail. It is full of his specially designed safecracking tools. The suitcase is mentioned regularly right up to the end. It is really a symbol. It identifies him as an expert safecracker, but it is also a heavy burden. When he goes straight he wants to get rid of that burden. He offers to give it to a friend and tells him the following in a letter.



Say, Billy, I've quit the old business—a year ago. I've got a nice store. I'm making an honest living, and I'm going to marry the finest girl on earth two weeks from now. It's the only life, Billy—the straight one. I wouldn't touch a dollar of another man's money now for a million. 



Then at the climax Jimmy is still burdened with his heavy suitcase and his old identity. He makes a noble sacrifice by opening the suitcase inside the bank and rescuing a little girl who has accidentally gotten locked inside the supposedly burglar-proof vault. In doing this, he knows he is losing his new identity, the girl he planned to marry, his reputation as a solid citizen, and surely going to prison for a long stretch. This is the most solid evidence that he has really become a "another man." Fortunately, Ben Price the bank detective has seen Jimmy noble deed and is himself convinced that Jimmy has changed and is no longer a threat to society. Instead of arresting Jimmy and getting him sentenced to what could be twelve years in prison for three bank jobs, Ben lets Jimmy keep his new identity. When Jimmy resignedly and despondently offers to give himself up to the law, Ben Price responds:



“Guess you're mistaken, Mr. Spencer,” he said. “Don't believe I recognize you. Your buggy's waiting for you, ain't it?”



Jimmy really has become a different man in every way, including his name. He is no longer Jimmy Valentine but Ralph Spencer, respectable small-town businessman and pillar of the community.

I'm writing a compare/contrast essay. I have to identify the similarities and differences between two characters. Should my thesis statement...

Generally, I would say you should include the points of comparison and contrast in your thesis statement. Otherwise, you get a thesis statement like this:


In The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan and Jay Gatsby are similar to one in other in some ways and different in others. 


You can see that is not a particularly informative or impressive statement. It does not give the reader a clue what you are going to say, and...

Generally, I would say you should include the points of comparison and contrast in your thesis statement. Otherwise, you get a thesis statement like this:



In The Great Gatsby, Tom Buchanan and Jay Gatsby are similar to one in other in some ways and different in others. 



You can see that is not a particularly informative or impressive statement. It does not give the reader a clue what you are going to say, and a thesis statement is meant to provide the reader with a workable outline of what is to follow.  This kind of statement also has the drawback of not making the reader all that interested in what you have to say, what we call the "So what?" factor.  That factor does not necessarily have to be in the thesis statement, but it works wonderfully well if it is. 


Now I will say that if you have a great many points to make about similarities and differences, you can end up with a long and clumsy statement, which you will want to avoid.  In a situation like that, the best thing to do is to place all the points into two or three discrete categories.  For example, I might say this about Daisy Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson (also from The Great Gatsby):



The differences and similarities of Daisy Buchanan and Myrtle Wilson, neither of them particularly likable, are reflected in their socioeconomic classes, their physical appearances, and their priorities. 



I have listed some general categories, and within each, I can pursue more than one point about similarities and differences.  I have also provided a kind of "So what?" element, as I make clear to the reader that these are not very likable women.  This is really my main idea in the thesis statement, with my supporting categories as my points.  If I were to list ten or twelve points of comparison and contrast, I would have a sentence that would not be easily navigable by the reader. Also notice that I have not designated which categories are about differences and which are about similarities, which leaves me free to pursue either or both in any of the categories I have listed.  


All in all, it is always best to include your points of contrast and comparison, at the very least, lumping them into a few categories that will cover all of them. If you can include your "So what?" element in the thesis statement, that is even better. 

Tuesday 27 October 2015

Why do you think the image of Marley appears to Scrooge in A Christmas Carol?

Marley appeared to Scrooge because he wanted to help him make more of his life.


Jacob Marley was Scrooge’s business partner.  He died seven years before the book opens, on Christmas Eve.  Scrooge did not have many friends and was not the most hospitable person.  However, Marley was a good friend to Scrooge.  Both of them had similar attitudes toward making money.


When he died, Marley became a ghost.  Marley first appeared in the knocker...

Marley appeared to Scrooge because he wanted to help him make more of his life.


Jacob Marley was Scrooge’s business partner.  He died seven years before the book opens, on Christmas Eve.  Scrooge did not have many friends and was not the most hospitable person.  However, Marley was a good friend to Scrooge.  Both of them had similar attitudes toward making money.


When he died, Marley became a ghost.  Marley first appeared in the knocker to get Scrooge off-balance.  He wanted Scrooge a little shaken.  When he sees Scrooge he explains why he became a ghost.  He said it was because he had not been a better man during his lifetime.



“It is required of every man,” the Ghost returned, “that the spirit within him should walk abroad among his fellowmen, and travel far and wide; and if that spirit goes not forth in life, it is condemned to do so after death. …” (Stave One)



The ghost of Marley tells Scrooge that he has to witness the inequities of the world without being able to change them.  He has been watching Scrooge, and somehow arranged a special chance for him.  He explains to Scrooge that he is fettered because of his greed during his life, and Scrooge has continued to add to his chains.



“Or would you know,” pursued the Ghost, “the weight and length of the strong coil you bear yourself? It was full as heavy and as long as this, seven Christmas Eves ago. You have laboured on it, since. It is a ponderous chain!” (Stave One)



It is because of this that Marley arranges for the three ghosts to visit Scrooge.  He does not give Scrooge many details, except that Scrooge has a “chance and hope” of escaping his fate.  Scrooge is not thrilled with the idea of being haunted by three Spirits.  Marley tells him that for his own sake, he needs to remember their visit.


Scrooge does go along with the ghosts, and their lessons are so strong that they actually work.  When Scrooge sees his past, present, and future and how he influences others, he emerges a changed man.  He realizes that Jacob Marley was right—mankind is everyone’s business, and it is his responsibility to help the less fortunate.

What are some examples of imagery in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game"?

Imagery is the creative way that an author uses the five senses: sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell. Authors use imagery to help readers draw from outside experiences with their senses in order to understand the context better. If readers can connect with a story on a deeper level, then they will have a more enjoyable experience with it.


"The Most Dangerous Game" takes place on an obscure island, so there are many descriptions just from the...

Imagery is the creative way that an author uses the five senses: sight, sound, taste, touch, and smell. Authors use imagery to help readers draw from outside experiences with their senses in order to understand the context better. If readers can connect with a story on a deeper level, then they will have a more enjoyable experience with it.


"The Most Dangerous Game" takes place on an obscure island, so there are many descriptions just from the setting that come from many of the five senses. (Sight and sound seem to be the most used images.) The story is written from Rainsford's point of view, which provides a position from which the reader can read and understand what he senses throughout his journey for survival. For example, Rainsford goes from falling off a yacht into the ocean, to dining and sleeping in a mansion, to being hunted through a jungle for his life. He requires the use of all his senses to help him survive the deadly game that Zaroff demands that he play. Below are some quotes from the story with different examples of imagery:


Sight:



"There was no breeze. The sea was as flat as a plate-glass window."


". . . giant rocks with razor edges crouch like a sea monster with wide-open jaws."



Sound:



"An evil place can, so to speak, broadcast vibrations of evil."


"Again he heard the sound, and again. Somewhere, off in the blackness, someone had fired a gun three times."


"Ten minutes of determined effort brought another sound to his ears--the most welcome he had ever heard--the muttering and growling of the sea breaking on a rocky shore."



Touch:



"The cry was pinched off short as the blood-warm waters of the Caribbean Sea closed over his head."


"Night found him leg-weary, with hands and face lashed by the branches, on a thickly wooded ridge."



Taste:



"'You have some wonderful heads here,' said Rainsford as he ate a particularly well-cooked filet mignon."



Smell:



"Then he straightened up and took from his case one of his black cigarettes; its pungent incense-like smoke floated up to Rainsford's nostrils."





Africans traditionally are said to have no sacred writings. Where can one find important information regarding these religions?

Traditional religious practices in Africa are by no means lost to the world, in spite of there not having been any written sacred texts.  There is oral tradition and also, African religions have been studied by scholars for a very long time, for example, anthropologists, theologians, and linguists. 


People practiced their religions and handed them down to succeeding generations well before there was writing. Even once man began to write, few people were literate, so...

Traditional religious practices in Africa are by no means lost to the world, in spite of there not having been any written sacred texts.  There is oral tradition and also, African religions have been studied by scholars for a very long time, for example, anthropologists, theologians, and linguists. 


People practiced their religions and handed them down to succeeding generations well before there was writing. Even once man began to write, few people were literate, so most religions were passed on this way for a very long time after writing was invented.  Thus sacred texts, for example, creation myths and rituals, became part of an oral tradition, just as they have been handed down by Native Americans.


Since Africa has been colonized, there have been people interested in studying religion in Africa, and in their studies, they have recorded what they have learned. Anthropologists have done many studies, and I have provided a link to an overview of one, as well as a few other websites that are reputable, for more information and suggested readings.  Missionaries, too, recorded some of what they learned about African religions, and this is another source of knowledge. Linguists study language all over the world, and in their studies of African languages, they also have gleaned knowledge of African religious practices. 


It is remarkable how successful oral tradition is at carrying on a religion. And fortunately, we have had enough people interested enough in pursuing knowledge of African religions to have a reasonable body of work on this subject. 

Monday 26 October 2015

During the book The Outsiders, why is there a rivalry between the greasers and the Socs? I know the Socs have more money and free time than the...

The conflict between the greasers and the Socs stems from class tension. While the Socs are the “West-side rich kids” who “get editorials in the paper for being a public disgrace one day and an asset to society the next,” the greasers, the boys from the East Side, are generally seen as wild, reckless, and irredeemable due to their poverty-stricken backgrounds. The greasers dislike how adult society pardons the Socs for their innumerable transgressions, as...

The conflict between the greasers and the Socs stems from class tension. While the Socs are the “West-side rich kids” who “get editorials in the paper for being a public disgrace one day and an asset to society the next,” the greasers, the boys from the East Side, are generally seen as wild, reckless, and irredeemable due to their poverty-stricken backgrounds. The greasers dislike how adult society pardons the Socs for their innumerable transgressions, as well as how the Socs flaunt their wealth in the greasers’ faces. The greasers’ anger towards the Socs is certainly justified, given that the Socs aren’t simply happy with enjoying their good fortune, but instead go out of their way to “jump greasers” for kicks.


The Socs really have no clear justification for their prejudicial attitude towards the greasers. While it’s true that the greasers have a different culture than that of the  Socs, the minor differences between them aren’t enough to justifiably cause enmity. For example, the greasers wear leather jackets and slick back their hair, while the Socs wear Madras plaid and keep their hair trim and neat. The greasers listen to Elvis Presley, while the Socs prefer the Beatles. Just because of these minor cultural differences, Soc characters like Bob don’t think twice about harassing and harming greasers. They have a truly prejudicial mindset that the author of The Outsiders, S.E. Hinton, clearly disdains.


Now, Socs wouldn’t describe the conflict this way. They’re under the delusion that the conflict stems from other sources. As Cherry, a Soc character, explains, “It's not just money. Part of it is, but not all. You greasers have a different set of values. You're more emotional.” Though Ponyboy reluctantly agrees with her argument, I’d urge you to question the underlying prejudice that motivates Cherry to view the conflict this way. Given that Cherry doesn’t have to think about money since her family is already wealthy, she’s less likely to fully understand the impact of money and class on the Socs’ attitudes toward the Greasers. She pinpoints emotion as a primary cause because money is irrelevant to her. It certainly isn't to the greasers, whose families are struggling for financial security. 


Apart from money, another reason for the conflict may be our human tendency towards vengeance. For example, the Socs jump a greaser, and the greasers’ friends feel obligated to seek revenge by hurting a Soc. This, in turn, provokes another Soc attack on the greasers due to the same obligation for revenge. As you can see, this quickly turns into a cycle of violence.

What actions were taken by the American colonists that helped to lead to rebellion following the French and Indian War?

There were several things the colonists did that helped lead the colonists to rebel against the British after the French and Indian War. One action the colonists took was some colonists refused to obey the Proclamation of 1763. They wanted land, and they were going to go and get it despite the law.


The colonists also protested the various tax laws passed by the British. The colonists believed the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts were...

There were several things the colonists did that helped lead the colonists to rebel against the British after the French and Indian War. One action the colonists took was some colonists refused to obey the Proclamation of 1763. They wanted land, and they were going to go and get it despite the law.


The colonists also protested the various tax laws passed by the British. The colonists believed the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts were illegal because they didn’t have representatives in Parliament to vote for these taxes. Thus, the colonists boycotted British goods and eventually started to make some of these products themselves. They organized committees of correspondence to keep the colonists aware of events throughout the colonies.


The colonists also agitated the British. The colonists were unruly toward the British soldiers the night of the Boston Massacre. They were throwing things at the British soldiers. The colonists also destroyed property by dumping tea into Boston Harbor in December 1773. These actions increased tensions in the colonies.


The colonists eventually formed their own militias. This suggested the colonists believed they were going to fight the British soldiers. Eventually, battles broke at Lexington and Concord in April 1775. These actions helped to bring about the Revolutionary War.

Sunday 25 October 2015

`6cos^2(x) - 3` Use a double angle formula to rewrite the expression.

By the double angle formula for cosine,


`cos(2x)=2cos^2x-1.`



Therefore our expression is equal to


`6cos^2(x)-3=3(2cos^2(x)-1)=3cos(2x).`

By the double angle formula for cosine,


`cos(2x)=2cos^2x-1.`



Therefore our expression is equal to


`6cos^2(x)-3=3(2cos^2(x)-1)=3cos(2x).`

What are some examples of imagery in the story "There Will Come Soft Rains"?

Imagery is description that uses the five senses: sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell. The imagery in Ray Bradbury's "There Will Come Short Rains" first reveals the pointlessness and poignance of a technology that keeps working once all the humans it serves have been destroyed. For example, there is pathos in the sound imagery of the house addressing nobody:


 The weather box on the front door sang quietly: "Rain, rain, go away; rubbers, raincoats for...

Imagery is description that uses the five senses: sight, sound, touch, taste, and smell. The imagery in Ray Bradbury's "There Will Come Short Rains" first reveals the pointlessness and poignance of a technology that keeps working once all the humans it serves have been destroyed. For example, there is pathos in the sound imagery of the house addressing nobody:



 The weather box on the front door sang quietly: "Rain, rain, go away; rubbers, raincoats for today…" 



Bradbury's poetic imagery personifies the house, making it seem like a human being. Here Bradbury uses sound imagery to personify the house's technology:



It quivered at each sound, the house did. If a sparrow brushed a window, the shade snapped up. The bird, startled, flew off! No, not even a bird must touch the house!



Below, Bradbury uses visual imagery to show a harsh and relentless technology trying to control nature:



For not a leaf fragment blew under the door but what the wall panels flipped open and the copper scrap rats flashed swiftly out. The offending dust, hair, or paper, seized in miniature steel jaws, was raced back to the burrows.



Ironically, technology, which is designed in this case to serve every need of the home's owners, is also what has destroyed the owners through a nuclear war. In the end, nature will win. Bradbury shows this in the following imagery of the house catching fire:



The wind blew. A failing tree bough crashed through the kitchen window. Cleaning solvent, bottled, shattered over the stove. The room was ablaze in an instant!



Bradbury continues to personify the house, and the following image, though primarily visual, also includes a sense of heat and motion:



The house shuddered, oak bone on bone, its bared skeleton cringing from the heat, its wire, its nerves revealed as if a surgeon had torn the skin off to let the red veins and capillaries quiver in the scalded air.



Imagery at the end shows the destruction of the house:



Smoke and silence. A great quantity of smoke.


Helen says "knowledge is happiness." How?

Helen explains her reasoning for this statement in the last paragraph of Chapter 20. Earlier in the chapter, she provides details about her educational pursuits. She outlines the courses she is taking, who her teachers are, and how difficult it is to study for tests. Then she quotes the typical quip, “Knowledge is power.” She refutes this with “Rather, knowledge is happiness.” She explains that knowing history and philosophy and all the rest of it...

Helen explains her reasoning for this statement in the last paragraph of Chapter 20. Earlier in the chapter, she provides details about her educational pursuits. She outlines the courses she is taking, who her teachers are, and how difficult it is to study for tests. Then she quotes the typical quip, “Knowledge is power.” She refutes this with “Rather, knowledge is happiness.” She explains that knowing history and philosophy and all the rest of it provides a person with vital connections to both the people of the past and to those in the present. It places you in the middle of the universe and makes you feel as though you belong to all of it. This is a warm thought for her, and one that borders on the spiritual or religious. Here’s the way she says it:



To know the thoughts and deeds that have marked man’s progress is to feel the great heart-throbs of humanity through the centuries; and if one does not feel in these pulsations a heavenward-striving, one must indeed be deaf to the harmonies of life.


Saturday 24 October 2015

A 1000-kg car traveling at 25 m/s runs into the rear of a stopped car that has a mass of 1500 kg and they stick together. What is the speed of the...

In a collision between vehicles, such as in this case, the moving vehicle will lose out on some momentum (product of mass and velocity of the object), while the stationary vehicle will gain some momentum. Using the conservation of momentum, the momentum remains conserved as the following equation:


m1v1 + m2v2 = MV


where, m1 and m2 are the masses of the moving and stationary vehicle, respectively. v1 and v2 are the velocities of moving...

In a collision between vehicles, such as in this case, the moving vehicle will lose out on some momentum (product of mass and velocity of the object), while the stationary vehicle will gain some momentum. Using the conservation of momentum, the momentum remains conserved as the following equation:


m1v1 + m2v2 = MV


where, m1 and m2 are the masses of the moving and stationary vehicle, respectively. v1 and v2 are the velocities of moving and stationary vehicle, respectively. M and V are the mass and velocity of the combined mass (consisting of the two vehicles) after the collision. 


Thus, 


1000 x 25 + 1500 x 0 = (1000 + 1500) V = 2500 V


or. V  = (25 x 1000) / 2500 = 10 m/s


Thus, the speed of combined cars, after the collision, is 10 m/s.


Here, we have assumed that the motion is in one-direction only. 


Hope this helps. 

Compare and contrast the developments in 17th-century England with those in 17th-century France. Explain the reasons for English stability and the...

English and French cultures were sufficiently similar, due to the Norman Conquest of 1066, that they shared in common many elements of language, artistic and cultural traditions, and even bloodlines, meaning that whenever they were not at war, they traded extensively with each other and were popular tourist destinations for each others citizens, with the English Grand Tour beginning in France, both due to tradition and the proximity of Diver to Calais. Despite this, several...

English and French cultures were sufficiently similar, due to the Norman Conquest of 1066, that they shared in common many elements of language, artistic and cultural traditions, and even bloodlines, meaning that whenever they were not at war, they traded extensively with each other and were popular tourist destinations for each others citizens, with the English Grand Tour beginning in France, both due to tradition and the proximity of Diver to Calais. Despite this, several factors caused the political and religious environments of the two nations to diverge by the seventeenth century.


The signing of the Magna Carta in 1215 reduced the power of the kings with respect to the nobles and enshrined the private property rights of all classes in England. The acts of Praemunire, Provisions, and Provisors restricted the powers of the Church and especially of the Pope in England. Finally, while the alliance of throne and altar, with the Pope and supporting Christian monarchs and Christian monarchs making Roman Catholicism a state religion, was active in France, Henry VIII's embrace of Protestantism, although creating a state church, nonetheless created a more malleable religious environment.


These two tendencies, restricting the power of the King and creating limited possibilities for religious freedom, happened only in England. While France entered the seventeenth century as a medieval-style absolutist monarchy, England had a greater tradition of civil liberties and a (limited) amount of distributed power, in which Parliament limited the power of the king. This meant that when Charles I attempted to impose personal rule in the style of the French kings, the English revolted, leading to the English Civil War of 1642 to 1651. From roughly 1649 to 1660, England was ruled either as a Commonwealth or by Cromwell directly as Lord Protector. When the monarchy was restored, the power of Parliament, especially of Commons was greater and that of the monarch less than before. Next, the Glorious Revolution of 1688, established a Bill of Rights limiting the monarch's power and also increased the power of Parliament. The reaction against James' Catholicism indirectly led to increasing tolerance for dissent. 


The political and religious freedoms that the English gained and the rise of the commons encouraged the growth of the middle classes. Rather than the hereditary prerogatives of the nobility being enforced, wealthy merchants and gentry tended to intermarry, defusing class tensions.


In France, on the other hand, the war against the Huguenots of Cardinal Richelieu and Louis XIII solidified the need for a strong monarch in alliance with the Roman Catholic Church to create political stability. Both Louis XIII and XIV used military success and personal power to reduce the powers of the Courts and Parlement de Paris.


Friday 23 October 2015

What is the Cyclops's lifestyle like in The Odyssey?

After Odysseus and his crew made their way from the land of the lotus eaters, they arrived in the land of the Cyclops. The Cyclops were remarkably huge beasts who led an unconventional lifestyle as described by Odysseus.


According to Odysseus the Cyclops were lawless brutes. They never tended their fields and only relied on the naturally growing plants and the goats they kept for sustenance. The Cyclops had no social meetings or gatherings and...

After Odysseus and his crew made their way from the land of the lotus eaters, they arrived in the land of the Cyclops. The Cyclops were remarkably huge beasts who led an unconventional lifestyle as described by Odysseus.


According to Odysseus the Cyclops were lawless brutes. They never tended their fields and only relied on the naturally growing plants and the goats they kept for sustenance. The Cyclops had no social meetings or gatherings and their association with each other was restricted to emergencies. Their focus was only confined to their immediate family. They established no laws to govern themselves. They lived in exclusion and order was only maintained in their homes, which were situated on the mountain peaks. The Cyclops did not travel outside their territory and thus were not equipped in ship building or sailing.



We sailed hence, always in much distress, till we came to the land of the lawless and inhuman Cyclopes. Now the Cyclopes neither plant nor plough, but trust in providence, and live on such wheat, barley, and grapes as grow wild without any kind of tillage, and their wild grapes yield them wine as the sun and the rain may grow them. They have no laws nor assemblies of the people, but live in caves on the tops of high mountains; each is lord and master in his family, and they take no account of their neighbors.


Thursday 22 October 2015

What was wrong with the No Child Left Behind Act?

There were many problems with the No Child Left Behind Act. In theory, the law sounded like a good idea. No child should get a poor education. Every child should be proficient in learning. Poor schools should be identified. However, in practice, the law had many drawbacks.


One drawback was the amount of testing being done. Students were taking so many tests that they were losing valuable instruction time. Many teachers reporting that the main...

There were many problems with the No Child Left Behind Act. In theory, the law sounded like a good idea. No child should get a poor education. Every child should be proficient in learning. Poor schools should be identified. However, in practice, the law had many drawbacks.


One drawback was the amount of testing being done. Students were taking so many tests that they were losing valuable instruction time. Many teachers reporting that the main classroom objective was to pass the tests. Some of the other valuable aspects of teaching, such as inquiry based and project based learning, were being discarded as students spent so much time preparing for and taking the tests.


Another drawback was that a school could be labeled as failing with just a slight shift in test scores. Schools with small populations could be impacted if just a few students didn’t do well on the tests. This could be an issue if new students with limited skills moved to the school. Also, the goal that 100 percent of the students would be proficient by 2013 was unrealistic.


Finally, since some subjects weren’t included in the testing, those subjects truly got left behind. Subjects like Social Studies were suddenly cut way back. In many elementary schools, Social Studies courses weren’t even taught. For some students, it wasn’t until high school that they had a yearlong Social Studies course. Almost all of the money for professional development went to Reading and Math. Teachers stopped attending Social Studies conferences and joining professional Social Studies organizations. While this wasn’t the intent of the law, it was one of the unintended consequences.


The law was one with good intentions. However, in practice, it didn’t work as smoothly or as well as people thought it would work.

What action does Rainsford take after Zaroff congratulates him in, "The Most Dangerous Game?"

Zaroff does indeed congratulate Rainsford.   In fact, he congratulates him twice in the story.  He first congratulates him when Rainsford makes a clever trap during the hunt.  He makes a Malay mancatcher. He also wounds Zaroff with this trap. Zaroff is impressed.


"Rainsford," called the general, "if you are within sound of my voice, as I suppose you are, let me congratulate you. Not many men know how to make a Malay mancatcher.


The second...

Zaroff does indeed congratulate Rainsford.   In fact, he congratulates him twice in the story.  He first congratulates him when Rainsford makes a clever trap during the hunt.  He makes a Malay mancatcher. He also wounds Zaroff with this trap. Zaroff is impressed.



"Rainsford," called the general, "if you are within sound of my voice, as I suppose you are, let me congratulate you. Not many men know how to make a Malay mancatcher.



The second time general Zaroff congratulates him comes at the end of the story, when Rainsford decides to go on the offensive.  This completely took Zaroff by surprise, because Rainsford does not try to wait it out in the wood by hiding. Presumably others have tried to wait it out. Rainsford swims to Zaroff’s house to surprise him. When Zaroff returns, he sees that Rainford is there.  He also knows that he will have to face Rainsford one on one in battle.



He says: The general sucked in his breath and smiled. "I congratulate you," he said. "You have won the game."



In this context, Rainsford presumably kills Zaroff.  We can assume this because he slept in Zaroff's bed. 

Wednesday 21 October 2015

What are some similarities between Judaism, Islam, and Christianity?

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are three of the world's major religions. The largest similarity between these three religions is that they are all monotheistic. This means that each of these religions believes that there is only one God. Another similarity is that each religion has a holy book from which they read. In Christianity, this book is the Holy Bible. In Judaism, it is the Hebrew Tanahk and in Islam it is the Koran. These religions...

Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are three of the world's major religions. The largest similarity between these three religions is that they are all monotheistic. This means that each of these religions believes that there is only one God. Another similarity is that each religion has a holy book from which they read. In Christianity, this book is the Holy Bible. In Judaism, it is the Hebrew Tanahk and in Islam it is the Koran. These religions also all believe in Jesus Christ, but the ways in which they view him are different. Only Christianity believes Jesus to be divine, but the other two religions do acknowledge his existence. Similarly, Christianity is the only religion that believes that Jesus was crucified for humanity's sins, whereas Judaism also believes he was crucified, but for claiming to be divine, and Islam does not believe he was crucified at all. Lastly, they all believe in some sort of hell for sinners. The beliefs vary, but there is an overall belief that people are punished in the afterlife for sins committed while alive.

Does Atticus's advice get taken or not in Chapter 3 of To Kill a Mockingbird?

After Scout's rough first day of school, Atticus teaches his daughter an important lesson in perspective. He challenges Scout to view situations from other people's perspective in order to become more tolerant of their given situation. Atticus tells Scout,


"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view . . . until you climb into his skin and walk around in it" (Lee, 19).


As the novel progresses, Scout...

After Scout's rough first day of school, Atticus teaches his daughter an important lesson in perspective. He challenges Scout to view situations from other people's perspective in order to become more tolerant of their given situation. Atticus tells Scout,



"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view . . . until you climb into his skin and walk around in it" (Lee, 19).



As the novel progresses, Scout develops her perspective and takes into account Atticus's earlier lesson. Following their raid on the Radley yard, Scout notices that Jem has been moody for an entire week. She says,



"As Atticus had once advised me to do, I tried to climb into Jem’s skin and walk around in it: if I had gone alone to the Radley Place at two in the morning, my funeral would have been held the next afternoon. So I left Jem alone and tried not to bother him" (Lee, 37).



Scout's attempt at viewing the situation from Jem's point of view allows her to become more empathetic to his situation. Scout also applies Atticus's lesson towards the end of the novel following Bob Ewell's attack. Scout is finally introduced to her reclusive neighbor and walks Boo home. While Scout is standing on Boo's porch, she views her neighborhood from Boo's perspective. Scout says,



"It was summertime, and two children scampered down the sidewalk toward a man approaching in the distance. The man waved, and the children raced each other to him. It was still summertime, and the children came closer . . . Atticus was right. One time he said you never really know a man until you stand in his shoes and walk around in them. Just standing on the Radley porch was enough" (Lee, 172).


I would like to analyze the poem "Still I Rise", by Maya Angelou. This is regarding my final year project which is a research project paper. So...

I’m not sure what you mean by “thesis title” because to me they are two different things.  The thesis is the main idea of the entire essay where a title is just a creative name that you give your essay.  Although they may be similar in content and idea, they are not the same; a title is much shorter than a thesis statement. 

If I was going to analyze “Still I Rise” by Maya Angelou, I would discuss her use of language and literary devices to get across the theme and main ideas of her poem.  I would analyze it for its tone and look for key words throughout the poem, like “sassiness”, that show the tone.  It is important to evaluate why she sets up a particular tone in the poem as well. 


In addition, I would discuss literary elements and devices such as figures of speech.  Throughout the poem, she uses metaphors to get across ideas of her worth.  For example, she understands her value as a person when she uses metaphors comparing her worth to oil fields, gold, and diamonds.  Look at all of the important figures of speech throughout the poem to analyze the poem for its deeper meaning.


Also, analyze her use of repetition with words and phrases like, “I rise”, to add emphasis and to get her message across.  In addition, investigate the connotations of words used when she describes the past and history of black Americans.  Words like, “bitter”, “trod”, “broken”, “bowed head”, etc.  have a negative connotation compared to her state of being in the poem.  Words like “sassiness”, “haughtiness”, “hopes springing high” are in direct opposition to Angelou’s description of the past. 


The allusions she makes to slavery, Africa, and other eras of history are another element of the poem you can analyze. 


To write a thesis, I would key on Angelou’s use of literary devices and elements to get across the main idea of the poem.  Figure out what that main idea is, and explain it through Angelou’s use of language.


For example, In “Still I Rise”, Maya Angelou uses language and literary devices to convey a message about _____(message)___________________ because/to show______(why she does it)________.

Tuesday 20 October 2015

What is an example of situational irony in Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451?

There is an example of situational irony on the very first page of Fahrenheit 451, when the reader meets the main character, Montag. In this opening paragraph, Montag's duties as a fireman and his enjoyment of the job are described to the reader:


With his symbolic helmet numbered 451 on his stolid head, and his eyes all orange flame with the thought of what came next, he flicked the igniter and the house jumped up...

There is an example of situational irony on the very first page of Fahrenheit 451, when the reader meets the main character, Montag. In this opening paragraph, Montag's duties as a fireman and his enjoyment of the job are described to the reader:



With his symbolic helmet numbered 451 on his stolid head, and his eyes all orange flame with the thought of what came next, he flicked the igniter and the house jumped up in a gorging fire that burned the evening sky red and yellow and black.



This situation is ironic because we would expect a fireman to put out fires, not to start them. In the world of Fahrenheit 451, however, firemen are the defenders of censorship and the burners of books. Though ironic to the reader, it is this description which foreshadows the conflict that Montag will experience as he comes to realise that this is a repressive system which does not make him truly happy. 


To escape this repression, however, there will be a second example of situational irony: Montag will have to burn his boss, Captain Beatty, as he fights against the book-burning which exists in his world.


For more examples of irony, please see the reference link provided. 

How is sympathy for Beowulf encouraged throughout the epic? Provide textual evidence for support.

Throughout the majority of the epic, Beowulf is seen as an epic hero. He is portrayed as a courageous, strong leader. A later section in Beowulf, titled "The Last Battle," is where readers can really see where sympathy is encouraged for the brave leader of the Geats. 


As indicated by the title, the section in which Beowulf battles the dragon is indeed his last and final battle. In just the first eight lines of...

Throughout the majority of the epic, Beowulf is seen as an epic hero. He is portrayed as a courageous, strong leader. A later section in Beowulf, titled "The Last Battle," is where readers can really see where sympathy is encouraged for the brave leader of the Geats. 


As indicated by the title, the section in which Beowulf battles the dragon is indeed his last and final battle. In just the first eight lines of the section, he says goodbye to all his followers for the last time; and his age and determination are revealed.



And Beowulf uttered his final boast:


"I've never known fear, as a youth I fought


In endless battles. I am old, now, 


But I will fight again, seek fame still,


If the dragon hiding in his tower dares


To face me." 


Then he said farewell to his followers, 


Each in his turn, for the last time:



Goodbyes are generally seen as a sad moment in the lives of people, especially when it is a goodbye for the final time. 


The admittance of his age and the assertion of calling himself "old" is sad in the sense that Beowulf knows he is going into battle with a disadvantage that he didn't have in his youthful years. 


Another place in this same section in which readers can find themselves sympathetic to Beowulf is when he is so close to defeat and all but one of his followers abandon him. 


The poem states: 



None of his comrades


Came to him, helped him, his brave and noble


Followers; they ran for their lives, fled


Deep in a wood. And only one of them


Remained, stood there, miserable, remembering, 


As a good man must, what kinship should mean.



The one man who stuck by his side was his cousin Wiglaf. Wiglaf gave thought to the memories he had with Beowulf and all the honorable things Beowulf had done for him. He reflected on how much he owes him. Readers sympathize with Beowulf because he was deserted by all the men who owed him their loyalties, and they should have shown him the respect and courage that he, for so long, had shown them. 

What is the procedure for converting single entry bookkeeping to double entry bookkeeping?

Your question asks about converting single-entry bookkeeping to double-entry bookkeeping.  In order to convert single-entry bookkeeping to double-entry bookkeeping, it is helpful to first understand why the methods are used.


First, single-entry bookkeeping is generally used by small companies that need an economical record or their income and expenses.  The single-entry system consists of three accounts: personal, cash, and bank. There is no trial balance or balance sheet.  Profit and loss statements are not possible,...

Your question asks about converting single-entry bookkeeping to double-entry bookkeeping.  In order to convert single-entry bookkeeping to double-entry bookkeeping, it is helpful to first understand why the methods are used.


First, single-entry bookkeeping is generally used by small companies that need an economical record or their income and expenses.  The single-entry system consists of three accounts: personal, cash, and bank. There is no trial balance or balance sheet.  Profit and loss statements are not possible, and limited views of the transactions are available.


Double-entry bookkeeping can be considered more reliable for several reasons.  To begin with, each transaction is methodically recorded as a debit, then as a credit.  This is done so a trial balance can check accuracy of the entries, which shows income and expenditure accounts.


To convert single-entry to double-entry bookkeeping, you first need an opening statement of accounts.  From this you will post all of the transactions into a double-entry journal system as a debit, then as a credit. 


Next, you should open two bank accounts.  One should be for expenses, and the other for income.  Each of these accounts should have a double-entry debit and credit on your journal and ledgers.


From there, you will take two more steps.  Run a trial balance of the journal and ledger to assure that your entries are correct.  Then prepare an income statement to compare the single to double-entry balances.


Once everything is in balance, prepare a finalized balance sheet.


In summary, it is fairly challenging, but not impossible to convert a single-entry bookkeeping system to a double-entry bookkeeping system.  Either system should have an independent audit done regularly to ensure accuracy and to provide accountability.

What happens to Lyddie and Charlie at the end of Chapter 1 of Lyddie?

Lyddie and Charlie are sent off to go to work.


Lyddie and Charlie stay on the family farm after their mother goes off to live with their uncle because she is not capable of living on her own.  Their mother takes their two younger sisters Agnes and Rachel with her.  Lyddie is smart enough and tough enough to survive well on the farm.  She and Charlie even mate their cow so that they have a...

Lyddie and Charlie are sent off to go to work.


Lyddie and Charlie stay on the family farm after their mother goes off to live with their uncle because she is not capable of living on her own.  Their mother takes their two younger sisters Agnes and Rachel with her.  Lyddie is smart enough and tough enough to survive well on the farm.  She and Charlie even mate their cow so that they have a calf to sell.


Even though Charlie and Lyddie are managing on their own, they get a letter from their mother telling them that the farm has been rented out and the cow and horse sold to pay off debts.  The children will need to both work to pay off the rest of the debt.



But we can stil hop. Meentime I hav hire you out to M. Cutler at the tavern and fer yr. brother to Bakers mill. The paschur, feelds and sugar bush is lent to M. Wescott to repay dets. Also cow and horse. Lv. at wuns you git this. (Ch. 1)



Lyddie is horrified that the family is being broken up yet again.  She longs to get everyone back together and back on the family farm.  She does not want to be a slave to some tavern owner.  However, Lyddie has no choice. Her mother owns her.



Lyddie burst into tears. "I'm sorry, Charlie," she said to her brother's amazed and anxious face. "I never expected this. We were doing so good, ey? You and me." (Ch. 1)



After getting the letter, Lyddie goes to Cutler’s Tavern and her brother goes to the mill.  Things work out much better for Charlie than Lyddie.  Charlie stays with a nice family that gets attached to him.  He is able to go to school.  Lyddie is stuck with the horrible mistress of the tavern, who treats her harshly and dismisses her after only a few months when she goes home to visit without permission.

Monday 19 October 2015

Who do the children in The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe symbolize?

To answer this question, it is important to understand that The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis is notan allegory. That means there is not a consistent one-to-one correspondence between certain characters and certain historic figures or abstract concepts. Still, readers can often recognize such similarities even when they are not completely consistent. In that way, one can see some symbolism  in the characters of the story. The strongest symbol is...

To answer this question, it is important to understand that The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis is not an allegory. That means there is not a consistent one-to-one correspondence between certain characters and certain historic figures or abstract concepts. Still, readers can often recognize such similarities even when they are not completely consistent. In that way, one can see some symbolism  in the characters of the story. The strongest symbol is Aslan, who because of his cruel death as a sacrifice for Edmund, seems to represent Jesus Christ, who was crucified to redeem sinners. With that in mind, we can consider how the children relate to Aslan and identify some symbolism. Edmund, the one who betrays his siblings and Aslan by giving allegiance to the White Witch, represents sinful mankind who has wandered away from God and needs redemption. Although there are biblical characters who we might associate with Edmund--for example, Thomas, who doubted, and Peter, who denied Christ--those analogies don't hold up that well. Lucy and Susan, who comfort Aslan and stay with him during the night before his death, can symbolize Jesus' disciples who prayed with him in the Garden of Gethsemane. Lucy, who is the first to meet Aslan after he comes back to life, could symbolize Mary Magdalene, the first to see Jesus after the resurrection. And Peter, who leads the battle against the forces of the White Witch, representing Satan, could symbolize the Christian who puts on the "whole armor of God" and fights the powers of darkness with the sword of the Spirit, which the Bible says is the Word of God. These are some possible ways to view the children as symbols. 

Why, in An Inspector Calls, can inspector Goole be perceived as unreal and what is the meaning of this?

Inspector Goole is the concretization of our conscience. He symbolizes our guilt and aspects relating to the acceptance of such guilt. Priestly uses the inspector to personify mankind's responsibility for the destiny of others. It is for this reason that he is not real.

Moreover, the inspector's demeanor throughout the play, as well as Priestly's initial depiction of him, speaks of an individual who reflects a supernatural essence. When the inspector enters the scene, he is described in the following terms:



The inspector need not be a big man but he creates at once an impression of massiveness, solidity and purposefulness. He is a man in his fifties, dressed in a plain darkish suit of the period. He speaks carefully, weightily, and has a disconcerting habit of looking hard at the person he addresses before actually speaking.



The description suggests that the inspector projects an innate power. His aura reflects someone of stature, an important individual. The manner of his speech also conveys a unique authority and a focus on what is important. Furthermore, his 'disconcerting habit of looking hard at the person he addresses before speaking' emphasizes this natural authority. His audience is instinctively ill at ease when he addresses them. Individually, they feel vulnerable when he addresses each of them.


The inspector's manner further conveys his authority. He is direct and to the point. He has no time for trivial chatter and deals with each of his targets in an even manner. He treats all of them equally and shows no sympathy for their point of view. He is remarkably unaffected by their responses on an emotional level and sticks to the facts. He is brutally honest.


More remarkable is the meticulous and merilessly direct manner in which he speaks about Eva's death. Whenever he mentions her, there is no hint of sentiment whatsoever. He, for example, tells his listeners in Act 1:



Two hours ago a young woman died on the infirmary. She'd been taken there this afternoon because she'd swallowed a lot of strong disinfectant. Burnt her inside out, of course.



His report is cold and clinical. Even Eric's shocked response leaves him unaffected and he continues in a very matter-of-fact manner:



Yes, she was in great agony. They did everything they could for her at the infirmary, but she died. Suicide, of course.



Clearly, inspector Goole's demeanor is not what one would expect from someone human - it is too extraordinarily unaffected. His audience, however, goes through a range of emotions throughout the play. 


Another indicator that the inspector cannot be human is the fact that he knows everything about everyone in the room's relationship with Eva, and this after learning about her death only a short time before. The best team of detectives in the world would not possibly have learned so much about a victim in such a short period of time. It would have taken months of investigation to gather so much evidence. The inspector seems to possess an a priori knowledge of Eva and his listeners - a definite indication of a supernatural power.


Finally, definite proof of the inspector's supernatural identity is found in the final lines of the play:



Birling: That was the police. A girl has just died – on her way to the Infirmary – after swallowing some disinfectant. And a police inspector is on his way here – to ask some – questions.



After inspector Gool had left, the family surmised about the fact that he was a fraud. Gerald had discovered that he was not stationed at the local constabulary and, in the end, he and the senior Birlings were quite relieved about having discovered the truth. Only Sheila and Eric were truly remorseful.


Later, Mr. Birling received the above-mentioned call, which shocked everyone, for they realized that they had just experienced an encounter with the supernatural.


As already mentioned, inspector Goole epitomizes our conscience. More specifically, though, his purpose was to make the Birlings, as well as Gerald, aware of their responsibilities with regard to especially those of a lesser persuasion, when they deal with them. He was there to make them aware of how self-absorbed they had been and how they were dismissive of the needs of others, symbolized by Eva. They were to acknowledge their role in her unfortunate death instead of being indifferent. As he says, in the final act:



But just remember this. One Eva Smith has gone – but there are millions and millions and millions of Eva Smiths and John Smiths still left with us, with their lives, their hopes and fears, their suffering and chance of happiness, all intertwined with our lives, and what we think and say and do. We don't live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when, if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. Good night.


Sunday 18 October 2015

What would be an example today of how the "profound and rapid changes" Gaudium et Spes discusses recoil upon humans in their individual and...

Perhaps the greatest change is the ubiquity and intrusiveness of the internet. Although the Council might welcome the way in which this technology offers the possibility of lifting people out of poverty and creating seamless global communications, they would probably have been very concerned about several of the effects of technology, especially mobile phones.


First, the Council would be concerned that phones can decrease authentic and loving ways of interacting with other people. When we...

Perhaps the greatest change is the ubiquity and intrusiveness of the internet. Although the Council might welcome the way in which this technology offers the possibility of lifting people out of poverty and creating seamless global communications, they would probably have been very concerned about several of the effects of technology, especially mobile phones.


First, the Council would be concerned that phones can decrease authentic and loving ways of interacting with other people. When we see people sitting together but checking their mobile phones rather than being completely focused on their friends or loved ones or families eating dinner separately each isolated in a technological bubble, we see technology become an obstacle to authentic human relationships. While the Council would have viewed positively the way social media enables us to keep in touch with distant friends, they would have been concerned about the way we may substitute generic broadcasts and updates for actually meeting our friends in person and giving them our full attention.


Next, while the promise of technology was to give everyone the opportunity to have access to knowledge and the tools for creating a fulfilling life free of economic want, within wealthy countries, the effect of technology has been to increase economic inequality, causing an even greater divide between the technologically privileged and an underclass lacking access to and skill with technology. As poverty and inequality were a major concern of Vatican II, the Council would have been quite concerned about the growth of economic inequality.


Finally, while the internet promises to give us access to the entire world, and the ability to learn about and interact with people from across the globe, it often becomes a way to stay within in bubble of people of our own socioeconomic and political views, rather than a tool for the sort of global and universal sympathies recommended by the Council. 

According to Dolphus Raymond, how will growing up change Scout and Dill in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?

Harper Lee's novel To Kill a Mockingbirdis, among other categories of literature, a coming-of-age story. When the novel begins, Jean Louise "Scout" Finch, the narrator, is a six-year-old girl. When the story ends, she is nine. Her older brother, Jeremy, or Jem, is ten when the novel begins and thirteen when it ends. In short, these are young children whose entire lives lie ahead of them. They have the advantage of a father who is...

Harper Lee's novel To Kill a Mockingbird is, among other categories of literature, a coming-of-age story. When the novel begins, Jean Louise "Scout" Finch, the narrator, is a six-year-old girl. When the story ends, she is nine. Her older brother, Jeremy, or Jem, is ten when the novel begins and thirteen when it ends. In short, these are young children whose entire lives lie ahead of them. They have the advantage of a father who is educated, wise, and tolerant, not only towards his children, but to the myriad temperaments and biases that permeate the fictitious county of Maycomb, Alabama, during the 1930s.


There are two main stories that run throughout To Kill a Mockingbird. The first involves the mysterious figure of Boo Radley. The other involves the trial of Tom Robinson, a hopelessly poor African American man accused of raping a white woman--among the most serious of charges that could be leveled in the American South during the period depicted in the novel. While the story of Boo Radley provides for Jem and Scout's summer entertainment (until, of course, the climactic event near the novel's ending), it is the rape trial of Tom Robinson that lends the novel its gravity and that allows for the education of Jem and Scout on human nature and the realities of racism.


One of To Kill a Mockingbird's peripheral characters is Dolphus Raymond, a white man "who lives with a black woman and has mixed children." Raymond pretends to be an alcoholic so that he can socialize with the town's African American community without being verbally or physically abused by the majority white population. Raymond is perceptive and decent and provides some insights and advice for the Finch children and for Dill during the course of the rape trial. As Scout points out, Dolphus Raymond lives a lie, but it is out of necessity, he replies, as it is the only way he can "live like I do because that's the way I want to live." Explaining to Scout the reason for Dill's emotional breakdown, he states, "Dill was crying and feeling sick about the racism he saw in that courtroom. But when he gets older he won't cry anymore."


Dolphus Raymond represents one of Lee's nobler characters but also one of her more cynical. He goes through life pretending to be a drunk so that he can live among the African American community in this deeply racist town. He has long become hardened to the realities of the American South, as has Atticus, Jem and Scout's father. He understands that, in time, the Finch children, and Dill, will become equally hardened to the indignities and injustices imposed upon people solely on the basis of their ethnicity.

How does an increase in foreign consumer income affect domestic aggregate expenditures and demand? I need to explain and show diagram. I am...

If foreign consumer income rises then domestic aggregate expenditures and demand will, all other things being equal, rise.  The reason for this is that foreign demand for imports will rise.


Let us say that we are using the United States as the “domestic” country.  People in countries like Japan, Canada, Germany, and China will be willing to buy some amount of imports from the United States.  Now imagine that the incomes of those people in...

If foreign consumer income rises then domestic aggregate expenditures and demand will, all other things being equal, rise.  The reason for this is that foreign demand for imports will rise.


Let us say that we are using the United States as the “domestic” country.  People in countries like Japan, Canada, Germany, and China will be willing to buy some amount of imports from the United States.  Now imagine that the incomes of those people in foreign countries increase.  Those people will now be able to afford more imports from the United States.


When the foreigners are able to demand more products that were made in the United States, aggregate demand in the US will rise.  One of the parts of aggregate demand is net exports.  This is the value of the goods the US exports minus the goods it imports.  If foreigners buy more goods made in the US, the value of US net exports will rise.  This will increase the US’s aggregate demand.  Thus, an increase in foreign consumers’ incomes will lead to an increase in US domestic aggregate demand.

Identify the type of figurative language used in the expression: "Pennies saved one and two at a time by bulldozing the grocer and the vegetable...

Your question refers to a phrase in the opening paragraph of O. Henry's "The Gift of the Magi". The phrase refers to the method by which Della has been able to scrape together a small amount of money, in other words repeatedly haggling withthe grocer, vegetable seller, and butcher. The type of figurative language used in this phrase is metaphor. A metaphor is a comparison of two things by stating or implying that one...

Your question refers to a phrase in the opening paragraph of O. Henry's "The Gift of the Magi". The phrase refers to the method by which Della has been able to scrape together a small amount of money, in other words repeatedly haggling with the grocer, vegetable seller, and butcher. The type of figurative language used in this phrase is metaphor. A metaphor is a comparison of two things by stating or implying that one thing is some other thing. In this case, Della is compared to a bulldozer because the pressure with which she argues with vendors to lower their prices for her is apparently forceful enough to knock over their objections, just like a bulldozer knocks obstacles out of its way. "Bulldozing" is a much more vivid way to describe Della's haggling than to say that she had "argued" about the prices of things.

How did being accused of plagiarism affect Helen Keller?

Helen was accused of intentional plagiarism when she was eleven years old. She had unintentionally plagiarized a story which had been read to her years before. Helen wrote what she thought was a creative story called "The Frost King." It was later brought to her attention that her story closely resembled another. Even though Helen was young and had not intended to plagiarize, she was questioned by an investigation committee made up of teachers and...

Helen was accused of intentional plagiarism when she was eleven years old. She had unintentionally plagiarized a story which had been read to her years before. Helen wrote what she thought was a creative story called "The Frost King." It was later brought to her attention that her story closely resembled another. Even though Helen was young and had not intended to plagiarize, she was questioned by an investigation committee made up of teachers and others. Mr. Anagnos, who had always been kind to her, became distant after the incident. They were never close again.


After this experience with plagiarism, Helen became a hesitant writer. She was constantly worried that she would write something which had previously been composed by someone else. Helen developed fears relating to the originality of her own writings. In her autobiography, The Story of My Life, Helen discussed her fears about writing:



The thought that what I wrote might not be absolutely my own tormented me (Chapter XV).



Even when Helen was in college and writing her autobiography, she wrote with hesitation. She desired to write with accuracy and only use her own words.

What are the allusions in Canto 23?

There is an allusion to Aesop's fable about the frog and the mouse, both of whom perish at the hands of a hawk. Dante makes a parallel between the frog and mouse with he and Virgil, begging the question whether or not they will make it through. 


There is a reference/allusion to Frederick II. Dante observes a group of tired, weeping people with mantles and hoods over their eyes. He says that their attire is...

There is an allusion to Aesop's fable about the frog and the mouse, both of whom perish at the hands of a hawk. Dante makes a parallel between the frog and mouse with he and Virgil, begging the question whether or not they will make it through. 


There is a reference/allusion to Frederick II. Dante observes a group of tired, weeping people with mantles and hoods over their eyes. He says that their attire is bright but heavy with lead underneath. Allegedly, Frederick II (Holy Roman Emperor in the 13th century) would clothe people in lead and have them burned. Dante suggests that their attire was like straw when compared with what these people in Hell are wearing. 


These lead-clad people are "hypocrites" and claim to be Frati Gaudenti, an order of knights under Pope Urban IV, who were accused of hypocrisy: looking out for their own personal gain rather than the greater good. 


Dante then sees Caiaphas, the Jewish High Priest, who is believed to have orchestrated the plan to convict and try Jesus Christ. Here they find Caiaphas crucified with three stakes on the ground. 

Friday 16 October 2015

Research and discuss 1 public health issue in the United States today. Explain and discuss the following: Explain why it is a public health...

The research you are being asked to do is a wonderful assignment because there are so many choices you could make.  The return of veterans requiring so much health care is a huge public health issue affecting thousands of people.  The idea that health care has a limit to resources would also be a topic as our population grows ever older which would mean that certain procedures might be limited to those under 75. 

However, the choice I would make would be the shortage of donated organs for people who need them. This is a public health issue as so many people die while waiting for donated organs, and the need is for every kind of organ such as heart, kidneys, liver or lungs.  The list goes far beyond that, but in the small group of people who live in my complex, we have one in the hospital waiting for a heart transplant, one who is on dialysis waiting for new kidneys, one who just died of pancreatic cancer and one who has been told that new kidneys will become a must soon.  None of them are on the top of any list and matches are hard to find as everything must be exactly right or the transplant will not take.


 Hospitals ask families if they wish to donate organs and are often turned down. Almost every organ which is usable is in high demand with a long waiting list.  The health policies require hospitals to follow guidelines before even asking a family for a donation, and because the question comes at the height of their sorrow, many families say no even if the person in question might have said yes.  There is a current policy of donors being listed on drivers' licenses, but that is not enough.


 Currently, the country is divided into regions so that if you are in region one, a heart which would work for you in region three is not available to you but only to someone in that region.  The system needs to be all one system so that anyone in any region can be assigned a heart from any region if everything fits, and that would require a new federal policy.  Transporting the organs is another issue as time is of the essence.  You could research if there are alternate ways of getting the organs from one hospital to another within the time limits of transplant if the regions system were not in place.


I wish you well as you do this very important paper.  Choose your issue wisely. 

Is there any personification in "The Tell-Tale Heart"?

Personification is a literary device in which the author attributes human characteristics and features to inanimate objects, ideas, or anima...