Monday 30 September 2013

How do Old Major and Napoleon's behaviors impact the animals? (compare and contrast)

This is a great question. 


In the beginning of the book, we read of Old Major.  He has a dream and calls the animals for a meeting, where he urges the animals for a rebellion against man.  He is a cogent speaker.  He says that man is the only animal that only consumes without producing.  He also says that the animals only work, and in the end they are slaughtered.  In short, they are slaves....

This is a great question. 


In the beginning of the book, we read of Old Major.  He has a dream and calls the animals for a meeting, where he urges the animals for a rebellion against man.  He is a cogent speaker.  He says that man is the only animal that only consumes without producing.  He also says that the animals only work, and in the end they are slaughtered.  In short, they are slaves. Old Major seems sincere.  The reader does not know this for sure, because he dies in chapter two. 


When it comes to Napoleon, he lives long enough for the reader to see his character.  He is a tyrant and conducts the farm to please himself and the other pigs.  Therefore, he is not sincere about the revolution. In fact, the farm is far worse under his leadership, and at the end of the book, he turns into a man. This shows that he is a new Jones. 

What effect did labor unions have on the working conditions in factories?

Depending on the time period in which you are referencing, labor unions had a mixed impact on working conditions. In the mid-1800s to late 1800s, labor unions weren’t very effective in accomplishing their goals. There were no laws that gave unions the right to exist. As a result, court decisions rarely supported union activities. Big business owners had all the power, and they rarely gave unions what they wanted.


As we entered the 1900s, things...

Depending on the time period in which you are referencing, labor unions had a mixed impact on working conditions. In the mid-1800s to late 1800s, labor unions weren’t very effective in accomplishing their goals. There were no laws that gave unions the right to exist. As a result, court decisions rarely supported union activities. Big business owners had all the power, and they rarely gave unions what they wanted.


As we entered the 1900s, things began to change. The Clayton Antitrust Act gave unions the right to exist. The Progressives were able to pass laws addressing the poor working conditions in factories. Worker compensation laws were passed along with health and safety regulations. Some workers got an eight-hour day, and child labor was banned. In the 1930s, the Wagner Act reinforced the idea that unions had the right to exist. The National Labor Relations Board was created to help workers resolve disputes. Eventually, the eight-hour day became the standard workday for workers in factories. During World War I and World War II, unions were able to improve conditions for workers. The government generally pressured companies to settle with unions in return for a no-strike pledge. We couldn't afford to have workers go on strike during a time of war. Thus in the 1900s, unions were more successful in improving conditions in factories than they were in the 1800s.

In Bud, Not Buddy, what did Bud do to Todd and why did he do it?

In Chapter 2, Todd Amos is beating up Bud when Mrs. Amos walks into the bedroom. Todd lies to his mother and fakes an asthma attack. Todd points to Bud's hand mark on his face, and Todd's parents make Bud sleep in the ominous looking shed. After Bud escapes a swarm of attacking hornets in the shed, he sneaks back into the Amos' house to get revenge on Todd. Bud quietly fills a glass with...

In Chapter 2, Todd Amos is beating up Bud when Mrs. Amos walks into the bedroom. Todd lies to his mother and fakes an asthma attack. Todd points to Bud's hand mark on his face, and Todd's parents make Bud sleep in the ominous looking shed. After Bud escapes a swarm of attacking hornets in the shed, he sneaks back into the Amos' house to get revenge on Todd. Bud quietly fills a glass with warm water and sneaks into Todd's room while he is asleep. Bud puts Todd's fingers in the glass and hopes that it will make Todd pee his bed. This doesn't work, and Bud decides to pour water over Todd's hand to get him to pee the bed. After another failed attempt to make Todd pee, Bud pours the warm water on Todd's pajama pants. Bud's final attempt is a success, and Todd Amos pees his bed. Todd had accused Bud of looking like a bed-wetter in front of Mrs. Amos earlier, which embarrassed Bud. Bud understands how embarrassing it is to be labeled a bed-wetter, and he decides to seek revenge on Todd for sticking a pencil up his nose, beating him up, calling him Buddy, and lying to Mrs. Amos who made Bud sleep in the shed.

Sunday 29 September 2013

How is Ophelia obedient in Hamlet?

In William Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet, Ophelia is traditionally characterized as extremely obedient, a trait typically attributed to the direct cause of her death. There are several scenes when Ophelia exhibits obedience: 



  • Obedience of her brother and father's wishes: Her father and brother warn her to stay away from Hamlet, who they believe could mistreat her due to their difference in class status. Despite her love for Hamlet, she acquiesces. 

  • Obedience of her father and...

In William Shakespeare's tragedy Hamlet, Ophelia is traditionally characterized as extremely obedient, a trait typically attributed to the direct cause of her death. There are several scenes when Ophelia exhibits obedience: 



  • Obedience of her brother and father's wishes: Her father and brother warn her to stay away from Hamlet, who they believe could mistreat her due to their difference in class status. Despite her love for Hamlet, she acquiesces. 


  • Obedience of her father and Claudius' wishes: Polonius and Claudius use Ophelia to spy on Hamlet, directing her to stage an interaction so that they can secretly watch. She quietly submits to this amoral request. 


  • Obedience of Hamlet's demands: Hamlet's treatment of Ophelia constantly oscillates between kind and cruel, but she still allows him to use her whenever he makes a request of her. 

How do you think Steinbeck uses Candy in Of Mice and Men to convey important ideas about society at that time?

Candy, the old, one-handed ranch hand, has outlived his usefulness, according to the standards of the time, with little government assistance and even less social interest, in those who have been handicapped in a physical way. In a time when the Great Depression has made everyone vulnerable, not just those who are “weak” or marginalized, Candy does not have a chance of self-support beyond the most menial labor. He is viewed as extraneous, just waiting...

Candy, the old, one-handed ranch hand, has outlived his usefulness, according to the standards of the time, with little government assistance and even less social interest, in those who have been handicapped in a physical way. In a time when the Great Depression has made everyone vulnerable, not just those who are “weak” or marginalized, Candy does not have a chance of self-support beyond the most menial labor. He is viewed as extraneous, just waiting to die. His dog becomes a parallel of him, though, unlike Candy, the dog is “put out of its misery” once he becomes a burden to the society of the ranch house. Also paralleling, Lennie (who is also shot to “put him out of his misery”), becomes a drag on George, even though he has made himself responsible for the mentally-handicapped man and thus choosing the time when it is best that Lennie be dead.


Candy, as well as the dog and Lennie, give a picture of society as Steinbeck sees it, when a government that has made itself responsible for the  safety of the nation also has the responsibility to care for its most vulnerable citizens. This failure to do so (as seen in the very existence of the Great Depression) has made human life of less value unless it can contribute in a “meaningful” way.

What is the daily routine of the automated house?

7 a.m. - The house wakes everyone (no one) up. 

7:09  - Breakfast time for a family of four: "eight pieces of perfectly browned toast, eight eggs sunnyside up, sixteen slices of bacon, two coffees, and two cool glasses of milk."


8:01 - The house ushers the dead children and adults to work and school.


8:30 - The house cleans up the uneaten breakfast. 


9:15 - The house sends out its robots to clean the entire place. 


10:15 - The sprinklers turn on. 


Noon - The house opens up for the family dog ("The front door recognized the dog voice and opened.") The dog is emaciated and suffers from radiation poisoning and dies. By 2 p.m., the house had removed the dead dog and most likely incinerated it.


2:35 p.m. - Bridge tables come out from the floor and lunch and drinks are served.


4 - The card tables and drinks are put away.  


4:30 - Nursery walls that look similar to those Bradbury describes in "The Veldt" glow waiting for the dead children. 


5 - Bath time


6, 7 and 8 - Dinner time and post-dinner drinks in the study with the fireplace glowing. 


9 - The beds are warmed electronically. 


9:05 - The house reads the Sara Teasdale poem "There Will Come Soft Rains."


10 - "The house began to die." A tree crashes into the house, a fire is ignited and the place burns up.


The story ends with the house's frightening repetition of the date: “Today is August 5, 2057, today is August 5, 2057, today is …"

Saturday 28 September 2013

Is social media necessary in today's world?

Social media allows people to connect and maintain relationships with people across the world, and it has become a regular part of the lives of people who live in developed nations. For many people, it is necessary. For example, many marketing and community engagement jobs require their employees to be proficient in all the major social media platforms; job-seekers who do not possess these skills are not likely to be hired. Similarly, businesses who do not...

Social media allows people to connect and maintain relationships with people across the world, and it has become a regular part of the lives of people who live in developed nations. For many people, it is necessary. For example, many marketing and community engagement jobs require their employees to be proficient in all the major social media platforms; job-seekers who do not possess these skills are not likely to be hired. Similarly, businesses who do not have a social media presence operate at a heavy disadvantage to their competitors who do.


However, social media does not have to be necessary. The vast majority of the world's inhabitants do not have access to social media, but even those who do can alter their lifestyles so that social media is not necessary. For instance, a person could pursue a job in which social media proficiency is not necessary. This person could also use traditional means to communicate with friends and family, such as writing letters or talking on the telephone.

I need help analyzing a passage in Lord of the Flies: "His ordinary voice sounded like a whisper after the harsh note of the conch. He laid the...

You really haven't done too badly. Some of your interpretations are spot on. Here are a few other ideas you could use. I have copied the text again.


His ordinary voice sounded like a whisper after the harsh note of the conch. He laid the conch against his lips, took a deep breath and blew once more. The note boomed again: and then at his firmer pressure, the note, fluking up an octave, became a strident blare more penetrating than before. Piggy was shouting something, his face pleased, his glasses flashing. The birds cried, small animals scuttered. Ralph's breath failed; the note dropped the octave, became a low wubber, was a rush of air.



Throughout this passage, Orwell provides us with a summary of what is to happen on the island. Some of the words and phrases are quite portentous and suggest that the boys' arrival spell trouble ahead.


The word 'ordinary' suggests Ralph's normalcy. He is not someone with any special gifts or talents, just an ordinary schoolboy caught in an extraordinary situation. Furthermore, the contrast between Ralph's voice and the sound of the conch indicates that the conch has greater command than Ralph, an indication that the conch wields greater power than he.


The conch's sound is 'harsh' just as one would expect the voice of someone in command should be. This is so in the rest of the novel as well. Ralph eventually loses control over the boys, whilst the conch retains most of its power. It is only when it is shattered, that it loses its authority. The use of 'whisper' also emphasizes this fact - Ralph's voice is later hardly heard since most of the boys do not listen to him.


One could suggest, furthermore, that the fact that Ralph 'blew once more' is symbolic of his repeated attempts in future, to speak to the boys and restore order. The fact that Ralph 'tried harder' also predicts that he will have to work repeatedly harder to get the boys to cooperate, to such an extent that he is deemed to be nagging, and his voice, just as the conch, becomes 'a strident blare' which is a jarring, irritating noise. Piggy is 'shouting something' proposes that his voice too, will be deemed worthless and undefinable. The boys will not find meaning in what he says.


The reference to Piggy's 'glasses flashing' is symbolic of Piggy's intellectual ability. He is brimful with ideas and rationality. It is he who wants logic and rules to govern the boys' actions. The reference also suggests the important role his glasses will play later. The fact that 'the birds cried, small animals scuttered' informs us of how the boys' arrival has disturbed the tranquility of the island. This further emphasizes the destruction of the natural order. The animals are not safe when humans invade their environment. As it is, the island is later almost completely destroyed by the boys when their fire runs rampant.


The last sentence is significant in that it accentuates Ralph's complete loss of power and control. He later is helpless and practically hopeless for he becomes the enemy, hunted by Jack and his savages, as if he were an animal.


I hope this helps. 

Friday 27 September 2013

Can someone please write a summary for chapters 7 and 8 of the book Outliers by Malcolm Gladwell?

Gladwell's "Outliers" attempts to explain the reasons why some people excel way outside average success rates in various fields while others fail or only achieve minimal success. He does this through various theories explained in each chapter. In chapter 7, Gladwell focuses on the way that cultural norms can impact outcomes by using an example of airline pilot performance in the face of various obstacles. The main idea of his theory about success here is...

Gladwell's "Outliers" attempts to explain the reasons why some people excel way outside average success rates in various fields while others fail or only achieve minimal success. He does this through various theories explained in each chapter. In chapter 7, Gladwell focuses on the way that cultural norms can impact outcomes by using an example of airline pilot performance in the face of various obstacles. The main idea of his theory about success here is that cultural legacy can impact success. He theorizes that for example, if you are from a culture where no one questions authority, not only can this impede success because no one questions what the authority states is fact but that it can even lead to disasters. The plane crash is evidence of this when a copilot won't question the pilot even though the copilot knows he is right about events in the cockpit and the plane crashes. By comparison, living in a culture that questions authority, leads to questioning and critical thinking by all and so, more people take risks going against authority that can lead to above average success.


In chapter 8, Gladwell again ties the chance of succeeding above and beyond norms to culture by referencing the persistence and attention to detail of Chinese rice farmers. In general, many Chinese students outperform students from other countries in math. According to Gladwell's theory, this is due to a culture that because of the main way of producing income, rice farming, has internalized the importance of extreme persistence and hard work. The persistence and hard work learned on the rice farm he theorizes, carries over into all aspects of life including math.

`int_0^(pi/2)(|sin(x) - cos(2x)|)dx` Evaluate the integral and interpret it as the area of a region. Sketch the region.

`int_0^(pi/2)` (|sin(x)-cos(2x)|)dx


Since `sin(x)-cos(2x)<=0,[0,pi/6]`


and `sin(x)-cos(2x)>=0,[pi/6,pi/2]`


So, the integral can be split as,


`=int_0^(pi/6)(-(sin(x)-cos(2x)))dx+int_(pi/6)^(pi/2)(sin(x)-cos(2x))dx`


`=int_0^(pi/6)(cos(2x)-sin(x))dx+int_(pi/6)^(pi/2)(sin(x)-cos(2x))dx`


`=[1/2sin(2x)+cos(x)]_0^(pi/6)+[-cos(x)-1/2sin(2x)]_(pi/6)^(pi/2)`


`=(1/2sin(pi/3)+cos(pi/6)-(1/2sin(0)+cos(0))+(-cos(pi/2)-1/2sin(pi))-(-cos(pi/6)-1/2sin(pi/3))`


`=(1/2*sqrt(3)/2+sqrt(3)/2)-(1)+(0)-(-sqrt(3)/2-1/2*sqrt(3)/2)`


`=(sqrt(3)/4+sqrt(3)/2-1+sqrt(3)/2+sqrt(3)/4)`


`=(3/2sqrt(3)-1)`


`~~1.598`


Graph is attached. Integral is the sum of the region from (0 to pi/6) and (pi/6 to pi/2).



` `

`int_0^(pi/2)` (|sin(x)-cos(2x)|)dx


Since `sin(x)-cos(2x)<=0,[0,pi/6]`


and `sin(x)-cos(2x)>=0,[pi/6,pi/2]`


So, the integral can be split as,


`=int_0^(pi/6)(-(sin(x)-cos(2x)))dx+int_(pi/6)^(pi/2)(sin(x)-cos(2x))dx`


`=int_0^(pi/6)(cos(2x)-sin(x))dx+int_(pi/6)^(pi/2)(sin(x)-cos(2x))dx`


`=[1/2sin(2x)+cos(x)]_0^(pi/6)+[-cos(x)-1/2sin(2x)]_(pi/6)^(pi/2)`


`=(1/2sin(pi/3)+cos(pi/6)-(1/2sin(0)+cos(0))+(-cos(pi/2)-1/2sin(pi))-(-cos(pi/6)-1/2sin(pi/3))`


`=(1/2*sqrt(3)/2+sqrt(3)/2)-(1)+(0)-(-sqrt(3)/2-1/2*sqrt(3)/2)`


`=(sqrt(3)/4+sqrt(3)/2-1+sqrt(3)/2+sqrt(3)/4)`


`=(3/2sqrt(3)-1)`


`~~1.598`


Graph is attached. Integral is the sum of the region from (0 to pi/6) and (pi/6 to pi/2).



` `

What happens to make Watson even more suspicious of Barrymore? What does he see when he follows him?

I believe you are referring to a part of The Hound of the Baskervilleswhere Dr. Watson has been sent to keep an eye on Baskerville Hall, with regular reports sent by letter to his partner Mr. Holmes. Watson has already grown suspicious of Barrymore for two reasons: First, the fact that while Mr. Barrymore and his wife would not inherit any substantial money from the death of Mr. Henry Baskerville, they would inherit a...

I believe you are referring to a part of The Hound of the Baskervilles where Dr. Watson has been sent to keep an eye on Baskerville Hall, with regular reports sent by letter to his partner Mr. Holmes. Watson has already grown suspicious of Barrymore for two reasons: First, the fact that while Mr. Barrymore and his wife would not inherit any substantial money from the death of Mr. Henry Baskerville, they would inherit a little and serve as de facto owners of Baskerville Hall. The couple are already maid and butler of the house, rather high-ranking in the makeup of household staff at this time in England. With the house and its income at their disposal, they could live quite the cozy life! What's more, Mr. Barrymore has a beard, and Dr. Watson and Mr. Holmes were followed by a man with a beard in London.


During his stay at Baskerville Hall, Dr. Watson has heard a woman crying in the middle of the night—Mrs. Barrymore. Could the death of her employer have been so upsetting to her? Dr. Watson also hears footsteps, and decides to investigate them. Upon hearing the footsteps pass his door, he creeps out and spies Mr. Barrymore walking quietly down the hall with a candle. He enters an empty room, where Watson sees him place the candle in the windowsill, wait expectantly for a few minutes, and then leave. The next day, Watson explores the same room and discovers it has an excellent view of and from the moor. He comes to believe that Mr. Barrymore is signalling someone, and indeed he is. It is later revealed that Mrs. Barrymore's brother is an escaped convict who is taking refuge in the moors, and every other night, Mr. Barrymore signals for them to meet so he can offer him some food.

What are the main symbols in Romeo and Juliet?

There are many symbols within Romeo and Juliet, but I'll overview some of the major symbols to help start the discussion.


  1. Light and Darkness - Shakespeare uses the symbols of light and darkness in many of his plays, but this is especially true in Romeo and Juliet. When Romeo sees Juliet on the balcony, he describes her as the sun. She is the bringer of lightness in his world. In previous scenes, Romeo was depressed and downtrodden, but Juliet brings a new perspective to Romeo. These symbols of light and darkness progress throughout the play, with images of candles and the sun returning in various situations. 


  2. Stars and Heaven - Juliet repeatedly uses the imagery of stars, asking to cut Romeo out into little stars and make a face of him in Heaven. This celestial imagery is used frequently, and while it is romantic, it often makes Romeo and Juliet appear quite young. Their love is juvenile, and yet Romeo and Juliet compare it to gods, heaven, and cosmic entities.  


  3. Poison - Poison is also a recurring symbol. There is the tangible poison that is used to put Juliet to sleep, as well as kill, but there is also symbolic poison. The hatred that is felt between the Montagues and Capulets is poisonous, for instance.

What makes the title, "Legal Alien," an oxymoron?

An oxymoron is a phrase or portmanteau which is composed of two words with differing, often opposing, meanings for the effect of novelty or complexity.


In this example, the words at odds with each other are "legal" and "alien." For something to be legal, it is acceptable or in compliance with the law. The term "legal" may also be used outside of its literal sense in reference to matters of the law. For something or...

An oxymoron is a phrase or portmanteau which is composed of two words with differing, often opposing, meanings for the effect of novelty or complexity.


In this example, the words at odds with each other are "legal" and "alien." For something to be legal, it is acceptable or in compliance with the law. The term "legal" may also be used outside of its literal sense in reference to matters of the law. For something or someone to be "alien," there are implications of foreignness and potentially unwelcome or illicit. Together, the terms "legal" and "alien" conjure up ideas about the legalities of being alien. 


In her poetry, Pat Mora dwells on the complex issue of Mexican American identity. There is a common judgment in American culture that people of Hispanic or Latino descent, particularly those who are not fully assimilated into Anglo-American culture, are possibly illegal immigrants. The subject of the alien or unwelcome foreigner is a hot issue in American culture. Unfortunately, the complexity of this issue is often overlooked. The identities of Mexican Americans may be muddled up in hundreds of years of borders being moved and forced assimilation. What does it mean to Pat Mora to be a legal alien? To have been born on American soil with Mexican heritage and be misidentified as illegal? Or to have been born in Mexico and crossed into America and be granted citizenship? Or something else?


As you read through Pat Mora's work, consider the ways in which one may be a "legal alien."

Why does Holden watch the game from the hill in The Catcher in the Rye?

When the novel opens, Holden is standing on top of a hill looking down at the football players and the fans. He gives two reasons why he is on the hill rather than down at the game, but neither reason is entirely satisfactory. The first reason is that he has been "ostracized" by the fencing team for losing all their equipment in New York. Holden is, or was, the manager of the team and responsible...

When the novel opens, Holden is standing on top of a hill looking down at the football players and the fans. He gives two reasons why he is on the hill rather than down at the game, but neither reason is entirely satisfactory. The first reason is that he has been "ostracized" by the fencing team for losing all their equipment in New York. Holden is, or was, the manager of the team and responsible for the foils, masks, and other fencing equipment. This hardly explains why he has gone up to the top of Thomsen Hill, though. More likely, Holden feels ashamed of himself and wants to be alone. If he were to join the crowd watching the game, word would get around that he had returned early because the fencing match had to be called off and that he was responsible. Holden's descriptions of his last days at Pencey reveal that he is an outsider and a loner even without being "ostracized." He doesn't appear to have a single friend at the school. This is partly because he is known to be flunking practically all his courses. Many of the students must already know that Holden has been expelled. 


Holden says that his other reason for being up on Thomsen Hill, or at least not at the game, is that he is on his way to visit his history teacher Mr. Spencer, who is confined to his bedroom with the grippe. This hardly seems to explain why Holden would have climbed a hill to get to Mr. Spencer's home. Holden's real reason becomes apparent when he says,



Only, I wasn't watching the game too much. What I was really hanging around for, I was trying to feel some kind of a good-by. . . I mean I've left schools and places I didn't even know I was leaving them. I hate that. I don't care if it's a sad good-by or a bad good-by, but when I leave a place I like to know I'm leaving it. If you don't, you feel even worse.



Holden has already flunked out of two other prep schools. He obviously feels miserable. He will have to face his parents and be made to feel even more miserable for disappointing them. It is difficult to understand this boy because he doesn't even understand himself. It is easy to commiserate with his feelings, though. He has nobody to say good-bye to because everybody dislikes him, with the possible exception of old Mr. Spencer, who sent him a note asking him to come and see him before he leaves for his home in New York City. That meeting takes place in Chapter Two, and it doesn't make Holden feel any better. It turns into a lecture from an old man in a room that smells of Vicks Nose Drops. By the time Holden gets through describing a few of his other acquaintances at Pencey, it isn't hard to understand why he makes the sudden rash decision to stop just "hanging around" and leave for New York immediately.

Thursday 26 September 2013

What passages are examples of direct and indirect characterization of Tom Robinson in Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird?

An author creates direct characterization by coming out and describing a character's traits, often through the voice of the narrator. In contrast, an author creates indirect characterization by showing a reader what a character is like rather than telling the reader. The reader is able to figure out the character's traits through the character's actions, things the character says, and even through other characters' responses to that character. Harper Lee mostly uses indirect characterizationto...

An author creates direct characterization by coming out and describing a character's traits, often through the voice of the narrator. In contrast, an author creates indirect characterization by showing a reader what a character is like rather than telling the reader. The reader is able to figure out the character's traits through the character's actions, things the character says, and even through other characters' responses to that character. Harper Lee mostly uses indirect characterization to tell the reader the few things we know about Tom Robinson in To Kill a Mockingbird.

One example of indirect characterization occurs early on in the book, soon after Atticus is given the case. In Chapter 9, Scout faces ridicule for the first time due to her father's decision to take the case, and that ridicule comes in the form of Cecil Jacobs announcing in the schoolyard that Scout's "daddy defended niggers." Since Scout is beginning to face ridicule, Atticus knows he must tell her a bit about Tom Robinson and the case so that she can begin to understand why taking the case is necessary. Author Lee first indirectly characterizes Tom Robinson through the information about him Atticus gives to Scout:



He's a member of Calpurnia's church, and Cal knows his family well. She says they're clean-living folks. (Ch. 9)



This indirect description of Robinson counts as Calpurnia's response to Robinson and is actually very informative since the reader already knows quite a bit about Calpurnia. We know she is a very morally upright person and would never be good friends with anyone who was not equally morally upright. Therefore, since we learn through this description that Robinson is a good friend of Cal's and a member of her church, we are also indirectly learning that Robinson is as equally spiritual and morally upright as Cal and, hence, most likely innocent of what he is being accused of.

Wednesday 25 September 2013

According to Julia, what is the one thing the party cannot do?

In Book 2, Chapter 7, Julia says:


"It's the one thing they can't do. They can make you say anything -- anything -- but they can't make you believe it. They can't get inside you."


What Julia means by this comment is that the party can monitor a person's thoughts and actions, through the telescreens, and can control their knowledge and understanding, through propaganda. They can even force a person to confess to a crime,...

In Book 2, Chapter 7, Julia says:



"It's the one thing they can't do. They can make you say anything -- anything -- but they can't make you believe it. They can't get inside you."



What Julia means by this comment is that the party can monitor a person's thoughts and actions, through the telescreens, and can control their knowledge and understanding, through propaganda. They can even force a person to confess to a crime, through torture, but they can never change the way a person naturally thinks and feels. She believes thought-control to be far outside of the party's realm; that people are too independent to succumb to brainwashing. She, therefore, represents the spirit of free thinking and this is one of the reasons why her fate in the book is so tragic. In an ironic twist, the party can and do get inside Julia's mind and change her thoughts. Though repeated torture, she repents of her previous political allegiances and learns to love Big Brother. This change is evident when Winston meets her again in Book 3, Chapter 6: 



"He did not attempt to kiss her, nor did they speak. As they walked back across the grass, she looked directly at him for the first time. It was only a momentary glance, full of contempt and dislike." 



Gone is the Julia who believed in her ability to control her own mind and, in her place, is a woman who has been broken and enslaved by Big Brother. 


What did the House Committee on Un-American Activities and Joseph McCarthy share in common? Why did they gain so much attention after WWII?

What the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and Senator Joseph McCarthy had in common was that they both worried about communism subverting the United States and they were both willing to intimidate and bully people who they suspected of wrongdoing.  Both HUAC and McCarthy got a great deal of attention soon after WWII because Americans were very concerned about the potential spread of communism and the danger it posed.


Both HUAC and McCarthy were obsessed...

What the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) and Senator Joseph McCarthy had in common was that they both worried about communism subverting the United States and they were both willing to intimidate and bully people who they suspected of wrongdoing.  Both HUAC and McCarthy got a great deal of attention soon after WWII because Americans were very concerned about the potential spread of communism and the danger it posed.


Both HUAC and McCarthy were obsessed with the idea that communists were infiltrating the US.  McCarthy claimed that there were many communists in the State Department.  He claimed that communists were corrupting the Army.  HUAC investigated Hollywood moviemakers, believing that they were using the movies to try to win people over to communism.  They were both willing to bully people and to use questionable tactics.  McCarthy claimed to have lists of confirmed communists that he never shared with anyone.  HUAC would grill witnesses, trying to get them to admit to being communist and trying to get them to finger others.


Both HUAC and McCarthy fed off of popular fear of communism.  After WWII, many people worried that communism was spreading and becoming more threatening.  They saw the USSR take control over Eastern Europe.  They saw China become communist and they saw North Korea invade South Korea.  They saw the Soviet Union get atomic bombs.  They worried that communism would spread and so they supported demagogues who promised to prevent the spread by exposing alleged communists within the US.

What were the goals of the British at the beginning of the war?And which one would John Paul Jones have impacted?

At the beginning of the Revolutionary War, the British had set some goals. One goal was to blockade the colonial coastline. The British wanted to use their navy, which was a big strength for them militarily, to prevent supplies from entering and leaving the colonies. The British hoped that by cutting off the trade of the colonists that they would weaken the colonists and force them to surrender. John Paul Jones was involved in fighting...

At the beginning of the Revolutionary War, the British had set some goals. One goal was to blockade the colonial coastline. The British wanted to use their navy, which was a big strength for them militarily, to prevent supplies from entering and leaving the colonies. The British hoped that by cutting off the trade of the colonists that they would weaken the colonists and force them to surrender. John Paul Jones was involved in fighting the British navy. He had some success against the British navy, but, overall, the colonial navy was not a factor in this war.


The primary land goal of Great Britain at the start of the Revolutionary War was to cut the New England colonies off from the rest of the colonies. The British planned to have the three armies arrive near Albany, New York. General Howe led one army, but he went south to Philadelphia instead of north to Albany. Thus, he never arrived in Albany. General Burgoyne would lead another army out of Canada, and Lieutenant General St. Leger’s army would meet his army there. However, St. Leger’s army was defeated, so only General Burgoyne arrived at Albany. He was greatly outnumbered and lost at the Battle of Saratoga.


The British were successful at sea but not on land in the beginning of the Revolutionary War. Eventually, the British moved the fighting to the south and the frontier later in the war as the whole empire had to be defended. In the beginning of the war, the focus was on gaining control of New England and controlling the waterways.

Tuesday 24 September 2013

What would a critical analysis of Othello be?

In any analysis relating to Othello as the main protagonist, one fact should stand central in our judgment—that Othello is an outsider. Once this fact is understood and appreciated, a true analysis of his character can be undertaken.

Venetian society was generally parochial. The Venetians were very keen to protect their morals, traditions and way of life from any external influence. As such, they displayed a certain level of snobbery, as can be seen in Iago's resentment that Cassio, a Florentine, had been appointed in a position which, he felt, he was more entitled and better qualified for.


In this scenario, then, Othello is introduced to us as a hero. He has overcome all the prejudice and has been given the highest honour—general of the Venetian army. Truly a remarkable achievement. We furthermore learn that he is not only a man of stature, but is also well-respected. He is welcomed into the house of Brabantio, a highly ranked citizen. We see from the duke's reticence to pass summary judgment over him as an indication of the esteem in which Othello is held.


We also learn that he is an experienced soldier, battle-hardened and one who has overcome many trials. Othello is of a different racial persuasion than the general Venetian populace, which makes his achievement even more exceptional. Othello is also not afraid to be further entrenched in Venetian culture and custom, for he takes a tremendous risk in eloping with Desdemona, a Venetian. To add to this, he is also much older than her, indicating that he was prepared to lose all he had gained to be with his one true love. This act, in itself, gains our admiration.


We know that Othello is also proud. for he speaks with authority about his prowess as a soldier and of his royal history. He is also humble, for he tells his audience (during his interrogation by the duke) that he is not a great speaker, but when he does speak, his eloquence is impressive. It is this talent which moved Desdemona to tears and inflamed her desire to be with him.


However, all this quickly unravels once Othello allows himself to fall victim to Iago's malicious manipulation. Our hero soon devolves into an anti-hero. We discover that Othello has issues which Iago gleefully exploits. We learn that he is insecure about his foreign status, his age, his race, his poor knowledge of Venetian custom and probably also the fact that he suffers from an uncontrollable ailment—seizures which are exacerbated when he is angered or stressed.


Our hero's feet of clay gradually crumble until they are nothing. Iago's persistent chiselling at Othello's ego brings out the worst in him. We discover that he is deeply jealous. He overreacts at Iago's initial subtle suggestions that Desdemona and Cassio are involved in an adulterous liaison. Although he confidently asserts that she had chosen him over all the other handsome Venetian men who were vying for her attention, there is a slight hint that he has been unnerved. Proof of this is when he insistently asks Iago questions about what he is implying when he, for example, after seeing Cassio slink away 'guilty like' from Desdemona's company, states, 'I like not that.'


The pernicious Iago sees his advantage and Othello becomes like putty in his hands. Iago is in full control and we feel pity for him but are, simultaneously, angry that he, a man of such stature, could be so feeble-minded and gullible as to bend to Iago's malevolent machinations.


In the end, Othello tragically becomes a victim of his own uncertainty. Although he had overcome so many tribulations, he is finally beaten by the fact that he could not overcome the one thing that stood between him and true love, acceptance and security: he was an outsider.  

What are the similarities and differences between Marxist theory and psychoanalytic theory in literature?

Both Marxist theory and psychoanalytic theory emphasize the examination and critique of underlying structures and their manifestations. With Marxist theory, one is analyzing the social structures which maintain and reproduce (material) culture. In particular, we look at class organization, ideology, and distribution of wealth. An example of a Marxist analysis of literature might be to consider European texts from 18th and 17th century. Around this time, many revolutions occurred. These revolutions challenged the "God-given" societal...

Both Marxist theory and psychoanalytic theory emphasize the examination and critique of underlying structures and their manifestations. With Marxist theory, one is analyzing the social structures which maintain and reproduce (material) culture. In particular, we look at class organization, ideology, and distribution of wealth. An example of a Marxist analysis of literature might be to consider European texts from 18th and 17th century. Around this time, many revolutions occurred. These revolutions challenged the "God-given" societal structure which justified the oppression of great numbers of people, keeping material wealth in the hands of very few. Literature from pre-revolutionary contexts may offer insight into how people thought about the world and its organization.


Psychoanalysis, on the other hand, focuses on the examination of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as well as the underlying structures and functions which cause them. Psychoanalytic examination of literature draws from Sigmund Freud's theories of psychoanalysis and holds that texts can be read as manifestations of underlying mental processes. For example, consider Shakespeare's relationship with depression (or "melancholy") as evidenced by the characters he wrote.

Monday 23 September 2013

"Oh, Nan, they are a bad lot; they intend ruin for all of us; but Antinous appears a blacker-hearted hound than any." Is the comparison made...

The comparison between Antinous and a black-hearted hound is not an epic simile; it is a regular old metaphor.  Epic similes should be much more detailed than this, and they also typically extend over many lines of text.  Further, an epic simile will compare two unalike things using the word like or as, which is the other characteristic of a simile. The comparison of Antinous to a dog is very short and lacks detail, and it...

The comparison between Antinous and a black-hearted hound is not an epic simile; it is a regular old metaphor.  Epic similes should be much more detailed than this, and they also typically extend over many lines of text.  Further, an epic simile will compare two unalike things using the word like or as, which is the other characteristic of a simile. The comparison of Antinous to a dog is very short and lacks detail, and it also does not make use of the word like or as


Consider the following epic simile about Odysseus when he is clinging to a rock in the ocean during one of Poseidon's storms:



"And just as, when a polyp is torn from out its bed, about its suckers clustering pebbles cling, so on the rocks pieces of skin were stripped from his strong hands." 



Note the level of detail here -- Odysseus isn't just a polyp clinging to a rock.  He is like a polyp torn out of its bed, with small rocks all stuck to it from how hard it was clinging.  This epic simile has a lot of detail, takes place over several lines, and uses the word "as" to make its comparison.

How would you appreciate A Midsummer Night's Dream as a comedy with reference to various characters?

Despite his reputation as an author of excellent tragedies and drama, Shakespeare is also often uproariously hilarious. Many people consider A Midsummer Night's Dream to be one of Shakespeare's funniest plays, and its status as a comedy owes much to its stellar cast of characters. In particular, the characters Puck and Nick Bottom do much to contribute to the play's comedic atmosphere.


Though all the craftsmen/players make for great comedic relief, Bottom is by far...

Despite his reputation as an author of excellent tragedies and drama, Shakespeare is also often uproariously hilarious. Many people consider A Midsummer Night's Dream to be one of Shakespeare's funniest plays, and its status as a comedy owes much to its stellar cast of characters. In particular, the characters Puck and Nick Bottom do much to contribute to the play's comedic atmosphere.


Though all the craftsmen/players make for great comedic relief, Bottom is by far the funniest. An arrogant but lovable blowhard, Bottom yearns to play all the roles in the craftsmen's play and sees no potential problems with this arrangement. Furthermore, he spends much of the play wrapped up in a romance with the fairy queen Titania, despite the fact that he simultaneously sports a donkey's head. As such, Bottom gives the audience the chance to enjoy some good old-fashioned physical comedy as he struts around with donkey's ears sprouting out of his skull.


Though Puck is not as bombastic as Bottom, he still is a major contributor to the comedic plot. Indeed, Puck is responsible for mistaking the identities of the Athenians lost in the wood, and as such he administers the love potion to the wrong people and causes the complicated romantic confusion that serves as the play's main plot. In that case, if it weren't for Puck, most of the play's hilarious action would not take place.

Saturday 21 September 2013

How does imagery and figurative language contribute to the development of the story?

Imagery, connotation, similes, and metaphors very much contribute to the mood and symbolism of the story as well as foreshadow future events. 


When Jerry goes to his "wild bay," he "slid[es] and scrap[es] down" an incline of "rough, sharp rock" to water that "showed stains of purple and darker blue."  These words are associated with pain, with something that can inflict pain, or with the effects of pain.  Even the image of stains of blue...

Imagery, connotation, similes, and metaphors very much contribute to the mood and symbolism of the story as well as foreshadow future events. 


When Jerry goes to his "wild bay," he "slid[es] and scrap[es] down" an incline of "rough, sharp rock" to water that "showed stains of purple and darker blue."  These words are associated with pain, with something that can inflict pain, or with the effects of pain.  Even the image of stains of blue and purple sound like a bruise.  Further, "rocks lay like discoloured monsters under the surface" of the water, and "irregular cold currents from the deep water shocked his limbs."  The initial simile is frightening, comparing the rocks to scary and violent creatures waiting for unsuspecting swimmers, as is the next tactile image of being physically shocked by random freezing jets of water.  From all of these painfully-connoted words to the frightening and shocking images and comparisons, we can gather that this wild bay is a place of danger to Jerry.  He is not safe here, not like the older boys who can play here without incident.  Jerry is too young for this bay.


On the other hand, the metaphor and simile used to describe his mother, on the "safe beach," clearly connote that it is a place for children, long before Jerry realizes it as such.  She was "a speck of yellow under an umbrella that looked like a slice of orange peel."  Such cheerful, citrus colors are more appropriate to a beach vacation; they are much more appropriate than the bruised colors of the "wild bay."  They help us to understand that the wild bay and the safe beach are much more than just two different places to play.

What views does Pauline Maier express about Thomas Jefferson, in American Scripture, that may be contrary to what the average American knows about...

Americans typically remember the Declaration of Independence as an individual work of genius, authored by Thomas Jefferson, who himself has become a sort of avatar of American liberty. Maier argues that the Declaration was really more of a statement of ideas that many Americans already held than an original document in its own right. As Maier points out, Jefferson himself said that it was intended to be "an expression of the American mind," and she...

Americans typically remember the Declaration of Independence as an individual work of genius, authored by Thomas Jefferson, who himself has become a sort of avatar of American liberty. Maier argues that the Declaration was really more of a statement of ideas that many Americans already held than an original document in its own right. As Maier points out, Jefferson himself said that it was intended to be "an expression of the American mind," and she notes that most of its ideas had been expressed in resolutions issued from several colonial assemblies, which Jefferson had surely read.


Maier's basic argument, which is very provocative, is that the Declaration of Independence was not a "solo performance," but rather a "production with a cast of hundreds, many of whom must remain nameless."  On top of the resolved issued on the colonial/state level, there were many "'other' Declarations of Independence," to quote the title of one of Maier's chapters. Town meetings, revolutionary Committees of Safety, and individual essayists (Thomas Paine, for example) issued a blizzard of calls for independence in the months preceding the summer of 1776. Most of these revolutionary documents were based on traditional English notions of liberty, ideas that dated back to the English Civil War and even the centuries-old Magna Carta. These "other Declarations," according to Maier, were the "voice of the people," and deserve more attention than they have received from scholars and ordinary Americans.


The Declaration, Maier argues, is only significant "insofar as it restated what virtually all Americans...thought and said in other words in other places." So according to American Scripture, Jefferson's role in "writing" the Declaration of Independence is perhaps less crucial than most Americans imagine.

Where can we find elements of comedy in Pride and Prejudice?

Certainly Mrs. Bennet is a source of humor for many. Her sheer ridiculousness and complete lack of self-awareness often renders her an object of horror for her two eldest daughters, but she is a font of hilarity for readers. The narrator describes her as having a mind not so "difficult to develope. She was a woman of mean understanding, little information, and uncertain temper. When she was discontented she fancied herself nervous. The business of her life was to get her daughters married; its solace was visiting and news" (Volume I, Chapter I). She is often oblivious to the social errors she commits, and even when she is not, she doesn't care enough to stop. Mrs. Bennet is basically an older version of Lydia, past the dangers associated with Lydia's age. She is vapid and silly.

Mr. Collins is yet another source of humor. He "was not a sensible man," though he had "a very good opinion of himself [....]  [H]is authority as a clergyman, and his rights as a rector, made him altogether a mixture of pride and obsequiousness, self-importance and humility" (Volume I, Chapter XV). His combination of proud haughtiness with his desire to flatter his social superiors, his high opinion of himself mixed with his ability to lower himself when called for in society makes him as ridiculous as Mrs. Bennet. He is constantly comparing everything to Rosings Park, his patroness's home, discussing the fixtures in that home along with their size, price, and so on. He is eager to make peace with the Bennets by choosing a daughter to marry, and when Mrs. Bennet informs him that Jane is taken, he quickly switches his affections to Elizabeth. His proposal to her is both insulting and absurd, and it is -- in large part -- hilarious and cringeworthy because he doesn't realize it.


Put the two together at the Netherfield ball, add Mary Bennet (with her eager desire to showcase her small talents) and Mr. Bennet (with his inability or unwillingness to abide by social convention), and we have the recipe for a horrifyingly hilarious scene. First, Mrs. Bennet speaks loudly about "her expectation that Jane would be soon married to Bingley" and how that "must throw [the other daughters] in the way of other rich men"  (Volume I, Chapter XVII). Then Mary leaps up "after very little entreaty" to play the piano for the company: "her voice was weak, and her manner affected. -- Elizabeth was in agonies." She sings a second song (which she ought not to have done), and Mr. Bennet jumps in and insists that she give "the other young ladies" an opportunity "to exhibit." His unfortunate word choice is likewise humiliating. Then, in the awkward silence which ensues, Mr. Collins stands up and begins an elaborate speech on the pleasures of music. "Many stared. -- Many smiled." This was neither the time nor the place for this conceited little man to wax philosophic about the subject of music; it was the time to actually have music. "To Elizabeth it appeared, that had her family made an agreement to expose themselves as much as they could during the evening, it would have been impossible for them to play their parts with more spirit, or finer success."


Through characters and scenes like this, we can find a great deal of humor. As Mr. Bennet says, "'For what do we live, but to make sport for our neighbours, and laugh at them in our turn?'"

What would the title of To the Lighthouse be if Virginia Woolf wrote this novel today?

To the Lighthouse, which Virginia Woolf published in 1927, is a three-part novel. In the first section, the Ramsay family spends the summer at their house at the Isle of Skye. The son, James, wants to visit the lighthouse just off the coast of the island the next day, and his mother assures him that he will be able to, but Mr. Ramsay believes the weather will not allow it.


In the second section,...

To the Lighthouse, which Virginia Woolf published in 1927, is a three-part novel. In the first section, the Ramsay family spends the summer at their house at the Isle of Skye. The son, James, wants to visit the lighthouse just off the coast of the island the next day, and his mother assures him that he will be able to, but Mr. Ramsay believes the weather will not allow it.


In the second section, called "Time Passes," a number of large human, political, and natural events unfold, including the turn of the seasons, the outbreak and end of the First World War, and the death of Mrs. Ramsay. The third section describes the remaining members of the Ramsay family, with some of their friends, back at the summer house at the Isle of Skye. James wants to go to the lighthouse again, and this time, he reaches it on a small boat. 


The lighthouse in this novel is a symbol of things that are desired, longed for, and unknown. Its importance changes over time: in the first section, it is the object of James' whim; in the third section, however, it has taken on greater importance, becoming a kind of pilgrimage site, as James wants to go not only to see the building, but also to honor his memory of his deceased mother.


The lighthouse works beautifully as a visual symbol for this purpose, and is often illuminated by the sun or shrouded in mist and fog. However, while To the Lighthouse is a very historical novel, the lighthouse itself is most powerful as a symbol, rather than a specific historical site, and wouldn't necessarily need to be "updated" if the novel was rewritten today. However, another novel that deals with the same themes might have its own "lighthouse"-- and that lighthouse could be any site or object that has a sheen of unattainability and significance as a personal memory. 

Friday 20 September 2013

What is an example of direct characterization for Atticus in Chapter 3 of Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird?

There are more indirect characterizations than direct ones in Chapter 3 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird. A "direct characterization" is simply a straight-forward way of describing an individual, usually employing simple adjectives. In Lee's novel, Atticus Finch serves as the story's conscience, the proffer of wisdom to his inquisitive and occasionally judgmental daughter, Scout, the novel's narrator.


As a thoughtful, conscientious and educated individual, Atticus often speaks metaphorically while using indirect characterizations...

There are more indirect characterizations than direct ones in Chapter 3 of Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird. A "direct characterization" is simply a straight-forward way of describing an individual, usually employing simple adjectives. In Lee's novel, Atticus Finch serves as the story's conscience, the proffer of wisdom to his inquisitive and occasionally judgmental daughter, Scout, the novel's narrator.


As a thoughtful, conscientious and educated individual, Atticus often speaks metaphorically while using indirect characterizations to diplomatically get his point across to his children. For this reason, it is particularly noteworthy that Atticus does use a direct characterization in Chapter 3 in reference to the character of Bob Ewell, the town's most virulently racist example of poor white trash, a man who squanders what welfare money he receives on alcohol while hunting and trapping animals out of season to put meat on his family's table. When the subject of the Ewells, the daughter of whom, Mayella, precipitates the tragic chain of events involving the crippled black Tom Robinson when she wrongfully accuses him of rape, comes up at the Finch home, Atticus uses what can be described as an example of direct characterization in referencing the Ewell family. As described by Scout in her ruminations about that period of her life:



"Atticus said the Ewells had been the disgrace of Maycomb for three generations. None of them had done an honest day’s work in his recollection."



This is a very direct characterization of the Ewells offered by Atticus. In this example, "the disgrace of Maycomb" constitutes a direct characterization, as it defines the characters of the Ewell family in a direct, straight-forward way. Another example of a direct characterization involving Atticus in Chapter 3 occurs in the context of Scout's efforts at being excused from school despite the absence of a compelling reason:



“If I didn’t go to school tomorrow, you’d force me to.”


“Let us leave it at this,” said Atticus dryly. “You, Miss Scout Finch, are of the common folk. You must obey the law.”



In the above passage, Atticus describes his daughter as "common folk," a direct characterization to which he applies to himself. In this context, "common folk" refers to all those citizens of Maycomb, and beyond, who are expected to comply with the word and the spirit of the laws that preserve the civilization in which they exist. Atticus is drawing a distinction between his children and those of the Ewell clan, with the latter being uncommon and consequently exempt from the strict rules of society the absence of which would result in total anarchy. Everybody accepts that the Ewells are beneath contempt, so expectations of them are nonexistent within the context of the laws that guide the rest of society.


A final example of a direct characterization involving Atticus in Chapter 3 again occurs within the context of Atticus's attempts at explaining to Scout why the latter is expected to continue to attend school without interruption and why she will continue reading with Calpurnia, the family's African American housekeeper. Noting the formality of her father's language as the educated lawyer negotiated an arrangement with his young daughter, Scout makes the following observation: "Jem and I were accustomed to our father’s last-will-and-testament diction . . ." This is a direct characterization because it explicitly defines the character of Atticus Finch, although it uses language the meaning of which would be lost were this passage read in a vacuum. Atticus has reverted to "attorney" mode for the purpose of engaging Scout in a quasi-legalistic negotiating process.


`(11pi)/12 = (3pi)/4 + pi/6` Find the exact values of the sine, cosine, and tangent of the angle.

`sin(u+v)=sin(u)cos(v)+cos(u)sin(v)`


`sin((3pi)/4+pi/6)=sin((3pi)/4)cos(pi/6)+cos((3pi)/4)sin(pi/6)`


`sin((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(sqrt2/2)(sqrt3/2)+(-sqrt2/2)(1/2)=(sqrt2/4)(sqrt3-1)`



`cos(u+v)=cos(u)cos(v)-sin(u)sin(v)`


`cos((3pi)/4+pi/6)=cos((3pi)/4)cos(pi/6)-sin((3pi)/4)sin(pi/6)`


`cos((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(-sqrt2/2)(sqrt3/2)-(sqrt2/2)(1/2)=(-sqrt2/4)(sqrt3+1)`



`tan(u+v)=(tan(u)+tan(v))/(1-tan(u)tan(v))`


`tan((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(tan((3pi)/4)+tan(pi/6))/(1-tan((3pi)/4)tan(pi/6))=(-1+(sqrt3/3))/(1-(-1)(sqrt3/3))=(-3+sqrt3)/(3+sqrt3)`


The rationalized answer is `-2+sqrt3.`



`sin(u+v)=sin(u)cos(v)+cos(u)sin(v)`


`sin((3pi)/4+pi/6)=sin((3pi)/4)cos(pi/6)+cos((3pi)/4)sin(pi/6)`


`sin((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(sqrt2/2)(sqrt3/2)+(-sqrt2/2)(1/2)=(sqrt2/4)(sqrt3-1)`



`cos(u+v)=cos(u)cos(v)-sin(u)sin(v)`


`cos((3pi)/4+pi/6)=cos((3pi)/4)cos(pi/6)-sin((3pi)/4)sin(pi/6)`


`cos((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(-sqrt2/2)(sqrt3/2)-(sqrt2/2)(1/2)=(-sqrt2/4)(sqrt3+1)`



`tan(u+v)=(tan(u)+tan(v))/(1-tan(u)tan(v))`


`tan((3pi)/4+pi/6)=(tan((3pi)/4)+tan(pi/6))/(1-tan((3pi)/4)tan(pi/6))=(-1+(sqrt3/3))/(1-(-1)(sqrt3/3))=(-3+sqrt3)/(3+sqrt3)`


The rationalized answer is `-2+sqrt3.`



What situations exist within a country that drive its people to revolution?

Revolutions are very complex, and arise for a number of different reasons. Let us look at a few of them, with some examples.


One condition that often leads to revolution is the existence of a class of people that feels disfranchised or shut out from full political or social participation. A good example of this would be the bourgeoisie, the members of the Third Estate in pre-Revolutionary France. They were mostly comfortable, educated merchants and...

Revolutions are very complex, and arise for a number of different reasons. Let us look at a few of them, with some examples.


One condition that often leads to revolution is the existence of a class of people that feels disfranchised or shut out from full political or social participation. A good example of this would be the bourgeoisie, the members of the Third Estate in pre-Revolutionary France. They were mostly comfortable, educated merchants and businessmen who felt that their social mobility was restrained by the old order in France, which retained certain privileges for the nobility and the clergy. Another example of this condition is the gens de couleur libre in Saint-Domingue. These people were mostly of mixed race, owning many slaves and controlling considerable wealth, but they were not allowed to vote or participate in the island's society in meaningful ways. They were the initial leaders of what would become the Haitian Revolution. Some people argue that the leaders of the American Revolution felt the same way about their place in the British Empire.


Another condition that leads to revolution is a nation's participation in a war. When things go bad, sometimes a revolution can ensue. The Russian Revolution is the classic example of this. Russian participation in World War I had been disastrous, leading to costly and humiliating defeats as well as severe shortages on the home front. This helped lead to the Russian Revolution, and the failure of the Provisional Government to remove the nation from the war after the first wave of the revolution helped lead to the Bolshevik Revolution, whose leaders promised the Russian people "peace, land, and bread."


Finally, nationalism can be a powerful force contributing to revolution. We can see it at work in the revolutions that spread throughout Europe in the early to mid nineteenth century. People came to feel nationalistic bonds with other peoples within their nation, and they resented being controlled by what they had come to see as foreign empires. Greek revolutionaries sought independence from the Ottoman Empire, Belgium from France, Hungary from Austria, and many others. Other revolutionaries, like in Italy and the German states, sought to unify their "nations," barely conceived of before then. 


All of these conditions can help contribute to revolutions, but there are many more. While comparing revolutions is a rich field of historical study, ultimately each revolution is unique. 

Thursday 19 September 2013

To what extent do violence and softness exert influence in the play?

You are perfectly correct in thinking that violence and softness, or violence versus softness, are important to Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire. The primary conflict is between Blanche DuBois and Stanley Kowalski. The conflict is over Stella, who is the "MacGuffin" or "bone of contention." Blanche is the protagonist and Stanley, although he is much bigger and stronger than Blanche, is the antagonist. Stanley is on the defensive. Blanche dislikes him because he is uncouth and lower-class. She tries to turn Stella against him and seems to be trying to break up their marriage, in spite of the fact that Stella is expecting a baby. 

Stanley is brutal and violent. Blanche pretends to be soft, sweet, gentle, refined, sentimental, idealistic. Significantly, Blanche has been an English teacher. She undoubtedly favors romantic poetry by such sentimental authors as Tennyson. She was married to a sentimental young man who wrote poetry. When she comes up against Stanley Kowalski, her attitudinizing is ineffectual. He is everything she is not. She has been said to be a symbol of the old South, while Stanley has been seen as a representative of the new dog-eat-dog South. He is not only animalistic, but he gets sweaty and greasy, drunk and disorderly. Blanche has a hard time maintaining her defense of dainty femininity against his brutal realism and candor. She amuses him. She despises him--but he despises her even more.


A Streetcar Named Desire is all about a contest between realism and idealism, between violence and softness, between masculinity and femininity. If Blanche had been as pure as she pretended to be, she might have had a better chance. But Stanley sees right through her. He finds out that her refinement is corrupt. He may be brutal but he is more moral and wholesome than she is. He may be ignorant, but he sees the truth. She may be educated, but she lives in a world of fantasy.


In Scene Nine she tells Mitch:



I don't want realism. I want magic! [Mitch laughs] Yes, yes, magic! I try to give that to people. I misrepresent things to them. I don't tell truth. I tell what ought to be truth. And if that is sinful, then let me be damned for it!--Don't turn the light on!



Her world is fragile and easily shattered--and Stanley Kowalski shatters it to pieces when she makes the mistake of becoming his adversary. At first she thinks it should be easy to defeat Stanley by making him look like a savage beast in contrast to her own refinement and sensitivity. But she finds out that he is much more subtle and resourceful than he appears on the surface. It is people like Stanley Kowalski who will prevail in the new South, and people like Blanche DuBois who will be trodden down.


It is interesting to see how William Faulkner describes Alfred, Lord Tennyson, who must be one of Blanche's favorite poets as well as a favorite of Faulkner's character Reverend Hightower in the great novel Light in August.



One wall of the study is lined with books. He pauses before them, seeking, until he finds the one which he wants. It is Tennyson. It is dogeared. He has had it ever since the seminary. He sits beneath the lamp and opens it. It does not take long. Soon the fine galloping language, the gutless swooning full of sapless trees and dehydrated lusts begins to swim smooth and swift and peaceful. It is better than praying without having to bother to think aloud. It is like listening in a cathedral to a eunuch chanting in a language which he does not even need to not understand.  


What is the central message in The Giver?

Different people will probably take away different messages from The Giver.  I will share the one that I have gleaned, and perhaps others will share theirs, too. You will need to decide what messages you have absorbed from this story. 


The message that I take away is that it is only possible to have a completely safe society if we take away peoples' choices, individuality, and emotions.  These are what make us who we...

Different people will probably take away different messages from The Giver.  I will share the one that I have gleaned, and perhaps others will share theirs, too. You will need to decide what messages you have absorbed from this story. 


The message that I take away is that it is only possible to have a completely safe society if we take away peoples' choices, individuality, and emotions.  These are what make us who we are, and it is a terrible tradeoff, in my opinion.  The people of the community do not get to choose their housing, their work, their spouses, or their children.  They must all even dress according to the rules.  Even what color ribbon a child wears is decided by the community, so there is absolutely no expression of individuality.  Emotions are repressed by medication, and so is sexual desire. All of this promotes the safety and productivity of the community, but the cost is too great for its denizens; they have given up their humanity for safety. 


I also think that this message has particular resonance in today's world, where people in some countries want to shut down their borders, spy on their populaces, and impose some sort of religious conformity, all in the interest of "national security."  There are no doubt some who think a dome, such as the dome that is in The Giver, would keep everyone safe. The message of the book is one that we should attend to, though, the idea that perfect safety comes at the cost of our own humanity. For me, that is too high of a price to pay. 


How has immigration influenced America?

This is a big question, worthy of a book, actually, but a brief overview is a good starting place.  America is a nation founded upon immigration, from its beginnings to the present. Aside from Native Americans, who were present when America began to be settled, we are all immigrants or descendants of immigrants.  The consequences of this are a country that is rich in talent, perseverance, and diversity, but which continues to have conflicts and prejudices concerning immigration. 

In the earlier years of our country, the metaphor for the United States regarding its immigrants was that it was a "melting pot."  Immigrants were encouraged to assimilate into mainstream culture, which was mostly an English and northern European-based culture, as quickly as they could, and most did so quite willingly, because they sought the American Dream and also because they faced tremendous prejudice.  There was a time, for example, when there were signs in shop windows saying "No Irish Need Apply." Waves of Italian and Portuguese immigrants faced similar circumstances, as did the enormous influx of eastern Europeans, who were allowed to come when immigration policies expanded in response to the need for labor.  At this point in our history, immigration from Latin America and Africa was virtually non-existent. Settlement houses were created to help immigrants learn to speak English, learn to cook the "American" way, and get them melted into the pot.  In those days, the influence of immigration was not so much to create diversity as it was to capitalize on the hard work of immigrants and any skills that they brought to their new country.  They saved their money, they worked hard, and they made sure their children were educated, but they largely abandoned the cultures they had been born into.  I have a dear friend of Italian descent, whose mother was born in Italy, in the 1920's.  My friend has always lamented the fact that her mother refused to do any Italian cooking, a good example of the immigrant attitude of those times, when immigrants had a profound influence with their hard work and contributions, but when they gave up to a large degree their cultural identity. 


Let's fast forward now to more recent times. Immigration policy has expanded to include people from all over the world, from Latin America, from Africa, from Asia, from India, and from the Middle East. Concomitantly, we have a conflicting metaphor in America, which is the "salad bowl."  Many people think that the melting pot is a mistake, that people should not relinquish their cultures when they come here, that we should celebrate the diversity of our immigrant population, more as the vegetables in a salad bowl are a pleasing combination of differences, happily co-existing together. This might not have created a conflict if we had maintained an immigration policy that focused on allowing the English and northern Europeans, since this was largely the prevailing culture here to begin with, but as more and more darker-skinned people, with cultures and religions that Americans perceive to be "alien" have immigrated, there are those whose prejudices cause them to take refuge in the melting pot metaphor, with movements to restrict immigration, with "English only" campaigns, and innumerable other efforts to eradicate diversity in the United States.  This has caused a great deal of dissension in the United States, and the electoral politics going on right now are a reflection of this, to allow only Christians from Syria to emigrate, for instance, or to build enormous walls at our borders.  During the Ebola crisis, many called for keeping out anyone from an African nation that had Ebola victims.  Thus, the influence of immigration has been to create great turmoil in American politics and policy. But the salad bowl metaphor had grabbed hold, giving the United States a wonderfully diverse culture.  We have Hindu temples, mosques, Korean churches, Cinco de Mayo, and Chinese New Year, just to name a few contributions to our culture.  


No matter what the prevailing metaphor is, though, the influence of immigration has been to create a great country, and the list of contributions is virtually endless. Edison was the offspring of immigrants, as was Alexander Graham Bell, as was Henry Ford.  Einstein was an immigrant, as was Tesla, as was Andrew Carnegie. Every business leader, scientist, and entrepreneur we have had in this country has been an immigrant or the offspring of immigrants.  There would be no America without them.

What two other services does Reverend Hooper attend the same day that he begins to wear the veil?

After he presides over afternoon services, Mr. Hooper officiates at a funeral first and then a wedding.  At the funeral, his veil was "an appropriate emblem."  It didn't seem so out of place at a funeral where its somber color echoed the sadness of the occasion.  The gloom and the pall that it casts over both the minister's whole person as well as anyone who looks at him seemed not incongruous in the context of...

After he presides over afternoon services, Mr. Hooper officiates at a funeral first and then a wedding.  At the funeral, his veil was "an appropriate emblem."  It didn't seem so out of place at a funeral where its somber color echoed the sadness of the occasion.  The gloom and the pall that it casts over both the minister's whole person as well as anyone who looks at him seemed not incongruous in the context of a sad funeral for a young maiden.


However, at the wedding, it is a dramatically different story.  Now, the veil is described as "horrible," and it seems to "portend nothing but evil to the wedding" where it had only "added deeper gloom to the funeral."  The bride quivers and shakes during the ceremony, "and her deathlike paleness caused a whisper that the maiden who had been buried a few hours before was come from her grave to be married."  People do not want to consider sins and souls and death at a wedding; they want to focus on the happiness possible in the here and now.  Moreover, when Mr. Hooper catches a glimpse of himself in a mirror, even he is so horrified by his aspect that he drops his wine and rushes out into the night. 

How do Cheever and Parris degrade Proctor in The Crucible?

I'm not sure that Cheever degrades John Proctor, but he does fail to treat Elizabeth Proctor with respect. In Act Two, when Cheever comes to the Proctors' home with a warrant for Elizabeth's arrest, he is bound to remove her and take her to jail. When he leads her out of the house and into the cart, he moves to chain her. John hurries out, shouting, "Damn you, man, you will not chain her! Off...

I'm not sure that Cheever degrades John Proctor, but he does fail to treat Elizabeth Proctor with respect. In Act Two, when Cheever comes to the Proctors' home with a warrant for Elizabeth's arrest, he is bound to remove her and take her to jail. When he leads her out of the house and into the cart, he moves to chain her. John hurries out, shouting, "Damn you, man, you will not chain her! Off with them! I'll not have it! I will not have her chained!" Despite his history with and knowledge of the Proctors, Cheever degrades Elizabeth by placing her in chains, as though she were already considered to be a criminal (which she really is). It is his job, but just because we are ordered to do something doesn't mean it is right that we should do it.


Reverend Parris certainly degrades John Proctor, and he does so in an attempt to maintain some authority within the proceedings. In Act Three, when Proctor, Giles Corey, and Francis Nurse come to speak with Judge Danforth about their wives, Parris cries, "This is a clear attack upon the court!" He is afraid that his knowledge of the girls dancing in the woods will come out, and Proctor has brought his servant, Mary Warren, who is one of those girls. He likely assumes that Proctor knows what Parris knows and so attempts to discredit him before he can reveal that information. Further, Parris tells Danforth,



All innocent and Christian people are happy for the courts in Salem! These people are gloomy for it. And I think you will want to know, from each and every one of them, what discontents them with you!  



In so saying, Parris attempts to blacken Proctor's name by insisting that he would be happy for the courts in Salem if he had nothing to hide. Certainly, this shows a lack of respect for Proctor's very real concerns for himself, and for his wife.  

Wednesday 18 September 2013

What are Herman Calloway’s feelings about Bud?

Herman Calloway views Bud with contempt throughout the novel. When Bud first meets Herman and tells Herman that he is his father, Herman calls him a disturbed young man and tells Jimmy to handle him. Herman dismisses Bud and even calls him a scamp. When Bud goes to the Sweet Pea, Jimmy invites Bud to sit with himself, Mr. Calloway, and Miss Thomas. Herman makes several insulting comments towards Bud before he gets up and...

Herman Calloway views Bud with contempt throughout the novel. When Bud first meets Herman and tells Herman that he is his father, Herman calls him a disturbed young man and tells Jimmy to handle him. Herman dismisses Bud and even calls him a scamp. When Bud goes to the Sweet Pea, Jimmy invites Bud to sit with himself, Mr. Calloway, and Miss Thomas. Herman makes several insulting comments towards Bud before he gets up and leaves. Herman argues with Miss Thomas about letting Bud stay with them and tells Bud that he's going to send him back to wherever he came from. Mr. Calloway threatens and accuses Bud of snooping around the house after Bud shows him that he has similar rocks with writing on them. Herman does not want anything to do with Bud and wishes he would go away. After it is discovered that Bud is Herman's grandson, the reader finds out why Herman Calloway is such an angry, grumpy man. Herman was very hard on his daughter because he wanted her to be tough enough to handle adversity throughout life. Herman's daughter ended up running away from home, and Herman never heard from her again. Over the years, Herman became a callous old man because he knew he was responsible for making his daughter run away.

Which nations helped the North during the American Civil War?

With the exception of some token gestures, no nations actively helped the Union during the Civil War. Russia under Tsar Alexander II was perhaps the most vocal in its support for the Union cause, but never offered anything beyond moral support. One might argue that Great Britain and France helped the Union (and indeed guaranteed its ultimate victory) by their refusal to recognize the Confederacy, to challenge the Northern blockade of the South, or to...

With the exception of some token gestures, no nations actively helped the Union during the Civil War. Russia under Tsar Alexander II was perhaps the most vocal in its support for the Union cause, but never offered anything beyond moral support. One might argue that Great Britain and France helped the Union (and indeed guaranteed its ultimate victory) by their refusal to recognize the Confederacy, to challenge the Northern blockade of the South, or to try to broker a mediated peace. But this would be overlooking the fact that both nations supplied the Confederacy with money, weapons, and other war materiel throughout the early years of the conflict. The Civil War was followed intently throughout the world, and many nations sent military observers to watch the conflict up close, a common practice at the time. But no nation provided significant material or military assistance to the North during the conflict. 

`A = 110^@ 15', a = 48, b = 16` Use the law of sines to solve the triangle. (Find missing sides/angles) Round answers to 2 decimal places.

Given: `A=110^@15', a=48, b=16`


Law of Sines `a/sin(A)=b/sin(B)=c/sin(C)`



`48/sin(110.25)=16/sin(B)=c/sin(C)`



`48/sin(110.25)=16/sin(B)`


`sin(B)=[16sin(110.25)]/48`


`sin(B)=.3127`


`B=arccos(.3127)`


`B=18.22^@`



`C-180-110.25-18.22`


`C=51.53^@`



`48/sin(110.25)=c/sin(51.53)`


`c=[48sin(51.53)]/sin(110.25)`


`c=40.06`


Given: `A=110^@15', a=48, b=16`


Law of Sines `a/sin(A)=b/sin(B)=c/sin(C)`



`48/sin(110.25)=16/sin(B)=c/sin(C)`



`48/sin(110.25)=16/sin(B)`


`sin(B)=[16sin(110.25)]/48`


`sin(B)=.3127`


`B=arccos(.3127)`


`B=18.22^@`



`C-180-110.25-18.22`


`C=51.53^@`



`48/sin(110.25)=c/sin(51.53)`


`c=[48sin(51.53)]/sin(110.25)`


`c=40.06`


Tuesday 17 September 2013

What, according to Marx, is the relationship between economic systems and culture? How might this relationship relate to the arts?

For Karl Marx, everything is determined by what he calls the mode of production, or the social relationships by which goods are produced for society.  This mode of thinking is sometimes called economic determinism, seeing the economic sphere--and its corresponding mode of production--as determining everything else in any given social arrangement, from politics to art.  Thus, art, for Marx, is an expression of the material economic relationships out of which it was produced.  In the ...

For Karl Marx, everything is determined by what he calls the mode of production, or the social relationships by which goods are produced for society.  This mode of thinking is sometimes called economic determinism, seeing the economic sphere--and its corresponding mode of production--as determining everything else in any given social arrangement, from politics to art.  Thus, art, for Marx, is an expression of the material economic relationships out of which it was produced.  In the Grundrisse's introduction he asks rhetorically,



is Achilles possible with powder and lead? Or the Iliad with the printing press, not to mention the printing machine? Do not the song and the saga and the muse necessarily come to an end with the printer's bar, hence do not the necessary conditions of epic poetry vanish?



In this brief series of questions, Marx implies that classical Greek epic--here represented by Homer's Iliad--requires a certain mode of production that does not include technologies such as powder, lead, and the printing press.  Thus, all (good) art for Marx requires that the artist express the material conditions of the age in which the artist produces the work.  As he implies, all artworks depend in their form upon certain necessary conditions which are inherently bound up with technological advancements and the mode of production.

Is Macbeth a tragic hero according to Aristotle's definition of the term? Explain why or why not.

Macbeth meets many of Aristotle’s tragic hero requirements.


Hamartia (tragic flaw): Macbeth does not seem to possess the flaw of ambition at the beginning of the play; in fact, that trait is more strongly exhibited by Lady Macbeth. But as the play progresses, Macbeth becomes more and more ambitious. His ambition is most fully realized when he orders the murder of Macduff’s family.


Peripeteia(reversal of fortune): When Fleance escapes the murderers, Macbeth feels that...

Macbeth meets many of Aristotle’s tragic hero requirements.


Hamartia (tragic flaw): Macbeth does not seem to possess the flaw of ambition at the beginning of the play; in fact, that trait is more strongly exhibited by Lady Macbeth. But as the play progresses, Macbeth becomes more and more ambitious. His ambition is most fully realized when he orders the murder of Macduff’s family.


Peripeteia (reversal of fortune): When Fleance escapes the murderers, Macbeth feels that he has not successfully insured the continuation of his royal line. This leads him to seek out the witches again, who confuse him and fill him with false confidence.


Anagnorisis (critical discovery): There are several points when this occurs. When he finds out that Macduff is technically “not of woman born” he realizes that he can, indeed, be killed by him. When the witches show him a future filled with Banquo’s royal descendants, he realizes that his crown is “fruitless.”


Nemesis (fate that cannot be avoided): This could be applied to several parts of the story. When servants report that Birnam Wood is marching on the castle, Macbeth realizes that the witches' first prophecy has misled him. He cannot escape the coming attack.


It seems a little strange to think of Macbeth in any sort of heroic terms, since he is such a bloody and ruthless tyrant. It is the fact that he started out heroically, in defense of Duncan’s kingdom, and then falls victim to his wife’s manipulative genius, that makes us look at Macbeth in the tragic sense—he was caught up in events that he could not control or foresee the consequences of. 

What part of the atmosphere has no weather disturbance? http://education.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/atmosphere/

The atmosphere is the gases that surround the Earth. It can be subdivided into layers going from the layer closest to Earth's surface upward until the atmosphere merges with interplanetary space. 


The troposphere which is closest to Earth's surface extends about 10 km and is the place where weather occurs. The stratosphere, mesosphere, and exosphere do NOT experience weather conditions like those in the lower troposphere layer!


The next layer is the stratosphere where the...

The atmosphere is the gases that surround the Earth. It can be subdivided into layers going from the layer closest to Earth's surface upward until the atmosphere merges with interplanetary space. 


The troposphere which is closest to Earth's surface extends about 10 km and is the place where weather occurs. The stratosphere, mesosphere, and exosphere do NOT experience weather conditions like those in the lower troposphere layer!


The next layer is the stratosphere where the temperature is fairly uniform and winds are very steady hence airplanes fly here to avoid weather conditions in the troposphere. This layer extends upward from 10-45 km.  In this layer we find the ozone layer which helps to shield Earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation. However, most weather patterns are in the troposphere below and NOT in the stratosphere. It is quite stable in this layer, and there is little convection due to the fact that air temperature increases as altitude increases in the stratosphere.


Next is the mesosphere where temperatures steadily drop and this extends from 45-80 km. upward. This is where meteors burn up usually as they enter the atmosphere and sometimes lightning can occur. There are strange clouds that form sometimes in this layer, but are not associated with weather patterns like those in the troposphere. 


The thermosphere is next which is extremely hot and extends from 80 to 500 km up. The amount of air is very thin in this layer and no weather conditions occur.


The exosphere is last which extends from 500 km until it merges with space. 


The layer closest to Earth which is the troposphere is where we experience storms, winds and clouds which are all features of weather patterns and the other higher layers do not!

Monday 16 September 2013

Environment pollution is an inevitable consequence of worldwide improvements in the standards of living. Discuss.

In last few decades, we have observed a general improvement in standards of living across the world. This improvement can be gauged in terms of better access to food and medicare (resulting in higher life expectancy), higher per capita GDP and higher literacy rate, etc. Many of these improvements require consumption of resources. For example, more food means better irrigation, more consumption of chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers, etc.), more mechanization, etc. Similarly, higher per capita GDP...

In last few decades, we have observed a general improvement in standards of living across the world. This improvement can be gauged in terms of better access to food and medicare (resulting in higher life expectancy), higher per capita GDP and higher literacy rate, etc. Many of these improvements require consumption of resources. For example, more food means better irrigation, more consumption of chemicals (pesticides, fertilizers, etc.), more mechanization, etc. Similarly, higher per capita GDP is achieved through industrialization, which requires (among others) energy and resources. As such, all these improvements mean higher consumption of fossil fuels for energy, higher rate of generation of wastes (solid, liquid and gaseous) from our industries and homes, etc. All these have environmental costs. Fossil fuels generate gases, industrial waste finds its way to our water bodies and/or land, gaseous emissions contaminate our air, etc. Thus, environmental pollution is an inevitable consequence of improvement in standards of living and unfortunately, severe environmental issues would be there (especially for rapidly developing countries, such as India and China), as recently seen with air quality in Beijing and New Delhi.


Hope this helps. 

What kind of president was Andrew Jackson?

Andrew Jackson was one of the most powerful, influential, and controversial Presidents in American history. He was such a remarkable figure that the period from the late 1820s to the early 1840s is often called the "Age of Jackson." Jackson rose to power amidst the expansion of the American electorate to include almost all white males, and he claimed that the office of the President should be used to carry out the will of the...

Andrew Jackson was one of the most powerful, influential, and controversial Presidents in American history. He was such a remarkable figure that the period from the late 1820s to the early 1840s is often called the "Age of Jackson." Jackson rose to power amidst the expansion of the American electorate to include almost all white males, and he claimed that the office of the President should be used to carry out the will of the American people.


Jackson was a fierce political fighter, and he, along with his second Vice President Martin van Buren, a very cagey politician, purged government offices of political rivals, replacing them with allies loyal to him. As a lifelong Indian fighter, he implemented a policy of removal, forcing the Native American peoples of the Southeast to move to designated Indian territory in modern Oklahoma. This opened up vast expanses of land for cotton growing and slavery. He even ignored a Supreme Court decision that nullified part of the Indian Removal Act, an unprecedented act by a President. As a champion of the so-called "common man," Jackson vetoed a rechartering of the Second Bank of the United States, seen by some as a vehicle for corruption and privilege. This was itself an enormous and fairly rare exercise of executive power, as was his threat to invade and subdue South Carolina when its leaders threatened secession over the Nullification Crisis in 1832-33. Jackson would go on to strangle the National Bank by removing federal deposits from it.


In short, Jackson was very much an activist president, more so than perhaps any previous leader. His political opponents formed a new party, and the name they chose--the "Whigs"--was telling. English Whigs were associated with opposition to royal despotism. Jackson was no king, but he was a remarkably powerful president for the times. 

In The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini, how do Hassan and Baba display courage by facing their fears?

Hassan and Baba are both courageous individuals throughout the novel The Kite Runner. Hassan displays his courage by standing up to Assef and threating to shoot his eye out when Assef attempts to harm him and Amir. Hassan also faces his fears by refusing to give Assef the kite at the end of the tournament. Despite knowing that he will be harmed, Hassan stands his ground against Assef. Baba also faces his fears and...

Hassan and Baba are both courageous individuals throughout the novel The Kite Runner. Hassan displays his courage by standing up to Assef and threating to shoot his eye out when Assef attempts to harm him and Amir. Hassan also faces his fears by refusing to give Assef the kite at the end of the tournament. Despite knowing that he will be harmed, Hassan stands his ground against Assef. Baba also faces his fears and displays courage throughout the novel. Baba is known for wrestling a bear and is viewed as a tough man. On their way out of Afghanistan, Baba stands up to a Russian soldier who attempts to rape an Afghan woman. Baba knows that the soldier could easily shoot him, but refuses to back down. Baba also faces his fear of becoming a failure when he moves to America. Despite losing his position of prominance that he held in Afghanistan, Baba displays courage by accepting a job at a gas station and working at a flea market on the weekends. His refusal to let his pride stand in his way depicts his courage. He also refuses to accept chemotherapy when he is diagnosed with cancer. Baba faces his fear and accepts the fact that he will die.

In J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye, why does Holden not like the Jesus's disciples?

Holden's biggest gripe in The Catcher in the Rye is "phony" (fake) people. Holden criticizes and judges everyone with whom he comes in contact, and that includes characters in books such as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and even the disciples from The Holy Bible. He recounts a discussion that he had about the disciples with a classmate from Whooton School named Arthur Childs who was a Quaker. Childs tells Holden that he should...

Holden's biggest gripe in The Catcher in the Rye is "phony" (fake) people. Holden criticizes and judges everyone with whom he comes in contact, and that includes characters in books such as Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, and even the disciples from The Holy Bible. He recounts a discussion that he had about the disciples with a classmate from Whooton School named Arthur Childs who was a Quaker. Childs tells Holden that he should like the disciples simply because Jesus chose them to help him out. Holden must have found something fake or phoney with the disciples, because that is what he usually finds annoying in people. Holden never says that in particular, but he does say the following:



"Take the Disciples for instance. They annoy the hell out of me, if you want to know the truth. They were all right after Jesus was dead and all, but while He was alive, they were about as much use to Him as a hole in the head. All they did was keep letting Him down" (99).



One can infer that if Holden thinks that the disciples let Jesus down all of the time that they were flaky, flighty, or phony in his eyes. It would seem that Holden identifies with Jesus and the feeling of having people let him down all of the time; then, he projects this onto the disciples and that's why he doesn't like them.

Sunday 15 September 2013

In Chapter 14, what is Lyddie's decision?

Lyddie makes several decisions in chapter 14, so I am not one hundred percent sure which decision that you are asking about.  


One decision that Lyddie makes is the decision to not sign the petition for improved work conditions.  She is afraid of getting blacklisted from the factories. 


In chapter 14, Lyddie is now the factory's best worker.  She is working multiple looms at the same time. Because of her proficiency, Lyddie is assigned...

Lyddie makes several decisions in chapter 14, so I am not one hundred percent sure which decision that you are asking about.  


One decision that Lyddie makes is the decision to not sign the petition for improved work conditions.  She is afraid of getting blacklisted from the factories. 


In chapter 14, Lyddie is now the factory's best worker.  She is working multiple looms at the same time. Because of her proficiency, Lyddie is assigned to train Brigid, a new factory girl.  Lyddie thinks that Brigid is stupid and incapable, and by the end of the first day, Lyddie decides to tell her boss that Brigid is ready for her own loom.  Lyddie does that because she is frustrated with teaching the new girl.  



By the end of the first day, the girl was far from ready to operate her own machine, but Lyddie had run out of patience.  She told Mr. Marsden to assign the girl a loom next to her own. 



The last thing that Lyddie decides to do is send a dollar home to her mother to help pay off the family debt.  

Is there any personification in &quot;The Tell-Tale Heart&quot;?

Personification is a literary device in which the author attributes human characteristics and features to inanimate objects, ideas, or anima...