One of the largest limitations on the agreement is it is not legally binding on any of the countries that took part in it. This was an attempt to continue to address the development of global warming, which is an increase in temperature world-wide. One would think an attempt would be made to which all parties involved would at least swear legally to uphold. Another limitation worthy of noting was there were only five countries...
One of the largest limitations on the agreement is it is not legally binding on any of the countries that took part in it. This was an attempt to continue to address the development of global warming, which is an increase in temperature world-wide. One would think an attempt would be made to which all parties involved would at least swear legally to uphold. Another limitation worthy of noting was there were only five countries that upheld the agreement. We are in a day and age where there are certainly more than five major players on the world scene, players that contribute to the aggregate buildup of greenhouse gases that promote global warming. A third limitation that would impend the success of the agreement was there were no clear targets or mechanisms established to achieve the goal in mind, that being to reduce global warming. An agreement on the world stage of this type would, at the very least, identify specific ways or ideas related to the overlapping theme of reducing the things that cause the phenomenon known as global warming.
No comments:
Post a Comment